Opened 15 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#1912 closed patch (fixed)
[PATCH] area not null for symbols with value zero
Reported by: | alicebtoklas | Owned by: | mhugent |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major: does not work as expected | Milestone: | Version 1.5.0 |
Component: | Symbology | Version: | Trunk |
Keywords: | area symbols | Cc: | msieczka, homann |
Must Fix for Release: | Yes | Platform: | All |
Platform Version: | Awaiting user input: | no |
Description
Maybe it's not the right place to talk about that, but:
using the "area scale field" to change the size of my point symbols, I get small symbols where the value in this field is zero, instead of no symbol at all. I think it's a big problem.
Cheers,
Alice
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Component: | Build/Install → Symbology |
---|---|
Owner: | removed |
Platform: | Debian → All |
follow-up: 4 comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Version: | HEAD |
---|
Replying to alicebtoklas:
Maybe it's not the right place to talk about that, but:
using the "area scale field" to change the size of my point symbols, I get small symbols where the value in this field is zero, instead of no symbol at all. I think it's a big problem.
I can confirm with 1.3.0. This is quite annoying and makes QGIS unusable for proportionate size cartography.
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
Replying to mlennert:
Replying to alicebtoklas:
Maybe it's not the right place to talk about that, but:
using the "area scale field" to change the size of my point symbols, I get small symbols where the value in this field is zero, instead of no symbol at all. I think it's a big problem.
I can confirm with 1.3.0. This is quite annoying and makes QGIS unusable for proportionate size cartography.
To complement this: whatever the value of the area scale field, if you put the Size field to 0.01, all symbols (at least circles) are of equal size. I imagine this is linked to the OP's issue.
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Must Fix for Release: | No → Yes |
Summary: | area not null for symbols with value zero → [PATCH] area not null for symbols with value zero |
Replying to alicebtoklas:
using the "area scale field" to change the size of my point symbols, I get small symbols where the value in this field is zero, instead of no symbol at all. I think it's a big problem.
Found the culprit: http://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/changeset/9513, which responds to http://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/1186 (putting Maciek and homann in cc, so that they can possibly react as well).
Applying the following patch, solves the problem of this current bug, while apparently not reopening #1186:
Index: qgsmarkercatalogue.cpp =================================================================== --- qgsmarkercatalogue.cpp (révision 12502) +++ qgsmarkercatalogue.cpp (copie de travail) @@ -118,12 +118,6 @@ // First prepare the paintdevice that the marker will be drawn onto // - // Introduce a minimum size, we don't want it to disappear. - if ( size < 4 ) - { - size = 4; - } - QImage myImage; int imageSize; if ( fullName.startsWith( "hard:" ) )
As already mentioned, this is a show-stopper for any proportionate symbol cartography in QGIS, and so should be solved ASAP.
I'm also a bit skeptical about the second part of #9513:
- if ( name == "circle" ) + // If radius is 0, draw a circle, so it wont disappear. + if ( name == "circle" || r < 1)
Why does r have to be defined as int ? And is this maybe deprecated since http://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/changeset/8976 ? I don't have the time to delve any deeper into the source code, but maybe someone can have a look.
But in any case, most of the issue of this bug seems to be solved by above patch.
Moritz
comment:6 by , 14 years ago
ping
This is a major issue for our usage of QGIS and it would be great if someone could at least have a look at the proposed patch.
Moritz
comment:7 by , 14 years ago
Owner: | set to |
---|---|
Type: | bug → patch |
I'm going to have a look at the patch.
Why does r have to be defined as int
This is probably legacy and comes from earlier times when all the symbol measures were in pixels.
comment:8 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I agree that those minimum marker sizes are not good in some situations. Therefore, patch is applied in r13161. Thanks!
I confirm it on the latest qgis version available on both linux and windows.