AGENDA

• Release date / schedule
• Features not yet implemented, but to be done?
• GeoCoder future?
• PostGIS 2.0 ticket triage?
• Links between PostGIS and other (non-GEOS topology libraries)
• Documentation / tutorials and starting points? (for raster? for topology?)
• 3D visibility calculations?
• Core vs Raster vs Topology

Features To Be Implemented Before Feature Freeze

• [raster] Two raster ST_Intersects (dustymugs - October 7) DONE
• [raster] Two raster version of MapAlgebra (dustymugs - Nov. 30) DONE
• [raster] Neighbor version of MapAlgebra (David - November 30) DONE
• [raster] C version of raster2pgsql (dustymugs - now!) DONE
• KNN GiST (PR mid-October) DONE
• GSERIALIZED clean-up (PR mid-October)
• GML 3.2 ouput (OC end October)
• 3D storage review (OC end November)
• ST_GeomFromJSON (end September) DONE
• Extensions for deployment for 9.1 (eta 2011-10-15 - work out kinks) robe — more or less DONE
• Extensions for deployment for 9.1/9.2 have install as part of core install
• [topology] Finish ISO functions set (strk - end October) DONE
• [topology] Geometry→TopoGeometry (strk - end December)
• BOX (ENVELOPE?) as a GEOMETRY sub-class? (PR end November)— We are punting this
• raster2pgsql as C utility instead of python (BP end November) (think this is a dupe

Release Date

• Feature Freeze (November 30) (this is a real freeze — hmm didn't happen yet!!) - perhaps end December
  • Q Branch (no!)
  • A No, branch at beta at the earliest.
• Alpha-1 Release (December 29)
• Developer Ticket Triage Event (January 5)
• Beta-1 Release (January 31)
  • Branch?
• Profit!

Boxes: Points of Discussion

• People want to sometime store boxes, how should they do ?
• Polygon as boxes are kind of bigger than it could be
• BOX2D lacks SRID (and is only 2d)
• We have some more BOX%%% which make people confused (me, at least)
• Having ops defined for boxes would allow extension (raster?) to only define casts to boxes in order to have proper indexing.
• As per the indexing argument, the box I have in mind is the equivalent of the box which is cached in normal Geometries

GIT

• Discussion
• Some are enthuastic
• Others are ±0
• General opinion, defer until 2.1 cycle (so that 2.1 comes out from git ? in that case we should start pretty soon after feature freeze, for any further development to happen)
• Pierre raises BIG issue: trac/git integration
  • See ​http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/720

Geocoder Discussion

• DBB, should it be part of core?
• Dbitner, so many tickets are geocoder, distracting to project
  • extras/geocoder ticket category ?
• Resolution: suck it up! Good functionality.

Core vs Raster vs Topology

• Should Raster be a mandatory part of the build and part of the postgis_core extention?
• Answer: yes, if we can get a binary raster2pgsql loader completed.
  • strk is always against mandatory stuff… could default to ON and allow —without-raster
• Implication: GDAL as mandatory dependency

• Research: can we figure out SRID automatically on load using OGR

Raster Discussion

• Subtiling
  • Future development, support internal tiling scheme in the serialized form for raster (see: GDAL internal tiling / GeoTIFF internal tiling. 1 bit for tiled/not tiled and tile size will have to be fixed e.g. 100x100 or 256x256 otherwise we have to wait for 3.0)

*raster2pgsql cleanup - Bug fixes and remove overviews

• To be done using rt_api.c? (overviews as post-process SQL call)
  • yes

• Aggregate versions of stats function (polygons versions?)
• documentation section about Best practices and PostGIS Raster rationale
• raster_column views? YES - DONE
• weighted summary functions for

3D external libraries discussion

• Can we start linking to other libraries for 3D support?
• Yes, OK.