Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#834 closed defect (fixed)
lw_collection_construct error
Reported by: | aperi2007 | Owned by: | strk |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | PostGIS 2.0.0 |
Component: | postgis | Version: | master |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
On a postgres 9.0.3, postgis 2.0.0 trunk on a windows machine, executing this query:
select id, st_intersection(b.geom,st_exteriorring(a.geom)), b.geom from table_polygons as a, table_linestrings as b where a.id = b.id and st_containsproperly(a.geom,b.geom)=false and st_crosses(b.geom,a.geom)=true ;
I'm having these error:
ERROR: lwcollection_construct: mixed dimension geometries: 2/0
I see the geometries of the two tables "table_polygons", and "table_linestrings" are both valid for ST_IsValid().
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 14 years ago
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
Uhm, I was wrong, lwcollection_construct is really talking about ZM flags. Some components of the result have a Z and some others don't. Could be a GEOS bug (intersection returning a collection of items with mixed coordinate dimensions).
Do your polygons or lines or both have a 3rd dimension ? Is the problem "fixed" by forcing them to 2d only ?
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
You are reason ! In effect the polygon are 3D and lines are 2D.
select id, st_intersection(b.geom,st_exteriorring(st_force_2d(a.geom))), b.geom from table_polygons as a, table_linestrings as b where a.id = b.id and st_containsproperly(a.geom,b.geom)=false and st_crosses(b.geom,a.geom)=true ;
the error disappeared.
follow-up: 5 comment:4 by , 14 years ago
I wonder what we should do about such cases.
Can see these posibilities:
- Inflating missing dimensions to uniform toward ceil
- Dropping exceeding dimensions to uniform toward floor
- Refuse to apply the overlay to inputs of mixed dimensions
What do you think ?
comment:5 by , 14 years ago
There isn't the right solution for every situation. I think is better to refuse to apply . So is the user to choice to ceil or to floor.
Replying to strk:
I wonder what we should do about such cases.
Can see these posibilities:
- Inflating missing dimensions to uniform toward ceil
- Dropping exceeding dimensions to uniform toward floor
- Refuse to apply the overlay to inputs of mixed dimensions
What do you think ?
comment:6 by , 14 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Priority: | medium → high |
Status: | new → assigned |
Version: | 1.5.X → trunk |
Smallest case:
select st_intersection('LINESTRING(0 0,0 10,10 10,10 0)', 'LINESTRING(10 10 4,10 0 5,0 0 5)');
Dropping a coordinate works fine.
comment:8 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
GEOS-3.2 unaffected. GEOS-3.3.0SVN fixed now.
I haven't looked at the code, but the message suggests lwcollectio_construct is confusing topological dimension with coordinate dimension. The query sounds like returning polygons and points…