Opened 21 months ago
Closed 14 months ago
#5297 closed defect (fixed)
woodie and dronie not picking up docbook check issues
Reported by: | robe | Owned by: | robe |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | critical | Milestone: | PostGIS 3.4.0 |
Component: | QA/buildbots | Version: | master |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
I don't know if this is an issue with the parallel build. That's the only real difference I see between dronie/woodie setup and the other cis.
The other cis were able to pick up this docbook check error:
https://github.com/postgis/postgis/actions/runs/3610840750/jobs/6084879392
But dronie and woodie showed green lights.
https://woodie.osgeo.org/postgis/postgis/build/16/10
except for failure in pg14 which looks unrelated
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 19 months ago
comment:2 by , 16 months ago
Milestone: | PostGIS 3.3.3 → PostGIS 3.4.0 |
---|
comment:3 by , 15 months ago
Regina: you intentionally removed docs building in dronie with [56d525e779fa814893a2a3cf772c1980a270b0d9/git]
I've added xmllint to the test image with https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/postgis/postgis-docker/commit/1a130b8ea7ae2d00baa35c13f7bf2378f1cec3a5 so once the new image is uploaded we should have better tests ( see also https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/postgis/postgis-docker/issues/11 )
comment:4 by , 15 months ago
for the record: install of xmllint should have been done properly with https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/postgis/postgis-docker/commit/9f8b62e94da65750ffda336d5f0b906b75a65919
comment:5 by , 15 months ago
I've started build https://debbie.postgis.net/view/PostGIS/job/PostGIS-docker/33/ which hopefully will result in publishing the updated image
comment:6 by , 14 months ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:7 by , 14 months ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
A Woodie build from 2 days ago is still missing xmllint: https://woodie.osgeo.org/postgis/postgis/build/429/7
I guess we need to add pull:true to the image config, see https://woodpecker-ci.org/docs/usage/pipeline-syntax
On line 1801 of the woodie build I read:
I guess we want
make check
to fail in that case rather than moving on