Opened 5 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#4673 closed defect (duplicate)
[raster] PG 13 / GDAL latest: rt_gdalwarp regress failing
Reported by: | Algunenano | Owned by: | dustymugs |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | PostGIS 3.1.0 |
Component: | raster | Version: | master |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Travis build: https://travis-ci.org/github/postgis/postgis/jobs/680390214#L2511
Extract (there are more lines):
--- rt_gdalwarp_expected 2020-04-28 03:50:06.000000000 +0000 +++ /tmp/pgis_reg/test_52_out 2020-04-28 03:56:03.643668132 +0000 @@ -8,28 +8,28 @@ NOTICE: Values must be provided for both X and Y when specifying the scale. Returning original raster NOTICE: Values must be provided for both X and Y when specifying the scale. Returning original raster 0.0||||||||||||| -0.1|993310|12|12|1|1009.894|-1009.894|0.000|0.000|950732.188|1409281.783|t|t|t +0.1|993310|12|12|1|1007.893|-1007.893|0.000|0.000|952282.217|1409722.366|t|t|t 0.10|992163|10|10|1|1000.000|-1000.000|0.000|0.000|-500000.000|600000.000|t|t|t 0.11|992163|11|10|1|1000.000|-1000.000|0.000|0.000|-500001.000|600000.000|t|t|t 0.12|992163|10|11|1|1000.000|-1000.000|0.000|0.000|-500000.000|600009.000|t|t|t 0.13|992163|11|11|1|1000.000|-1000.000|0.000|0.000|-500100.000|600950.000|t|t|t 0.14|992163|201|201|1|50.000|50.000|0.000|0.000|-500040.000|589957.000|t|t|t 0.15|992163|84|84|1|121.000|121.000|0.000|0.000|-500093.000|589875.000|t|t|t -0.16|993310|243|243|1|50.000|50.000|0.000|0.000|950710.000|1397157.000|t|t|t -0.17|993310|243|243|1|50.000|50.000|0.000|0.000|950710.000|1397157.000|t|t|t +0.16|993310|243|243|1|50.000|50.000|0.000|0.000|952260.000|1397607.000|t|t|t +0.17|993310|243|243|1|50.000|50.000|0.000|0.000|952260.000|1397607.000|t|t|t
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 5 years ago
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
Priority: | medium → high |
---|
I've hit this again when preparing PG13 images with PROJ 7 and GDAL 3.0.1 (#4701). I could not see an easy change to fix this (I don't really know much about raster) so for now I'm going to disable those tests and continue in my merry way.
comment:4 by , 4 years ago
Not sure this is related, but debbie has been failing for a while at least since July 7th (probably earlier but I've she only keeps last 10 runs or so) testing GDAL Master (3.2) (I got to flip the version)
-------------- Dependencies -------------- GEOS config: /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/geos/rel-3.9w64/bin/geos-config GEOS version: 3.9.0dev GDAL config: /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/gdal/rel-3.1w64/bin/gdal-config GDAL version: 3.2.0 SFCGAL config: /usr/bin/sfcgal-config SFCGAL version: 1.3.7 PostgreSQL config: /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/pg/rel/pg10w64/bin/pg_config PostgreSQL version: PostgreSQL 10.13 PROJ4 version: 71 Libxml2 config: /usr/bin/xml2-config Libxml2 version: 2.9.10 JSON-C support: yes protobuf support: yes protobuf-c version: 1003003 PCRE support: no Perl: /usr/bin/perl Wagyu: yes
INFO: Self-intersection at or near point 2 -2 FAILED
- cu_raster_geometry.c:296 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"MULTIPOLYGON(((1 0,1 -1,0 -1,0 -5,4 -5,5 -5,5 0,1 0)))")
- cu_raster_geometry.c:308 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"MULTIPOLYGON(((1 0,1 -1,0 -1,0 -5,4 -5,5 -5,5 0,1 0),(1 -1,1 -2,2 -2,2 -1,1 -1)))")
- cu_raster_geometry.c:321 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"MULTIPOLYGON(((1 -1,1 0,5 0,5 -5,4 -5,0 -5,0 -1,1 -1),(1 -1,1 -2,2 -2,2 -1,1 -1),(2 -2,2 -3,3 -3,3 -2,2 -2)))")
- cu_raster_geometry.c:335 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"MULTIPOLYGON(((1 -1,1 0,5 0,5 -5,4 -5,0 -5,0 -1,1 -1),(1 -1,1 -2,2 -2,2 -1,1 -1),(2 -2,2 -3,3 -3,3 -2,2 -2),(3 -3,3 -4,4 -4,4 -3,3 -3)))")
- cu_raster_geometry.c:363 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"MULTIPOLYGON(((1 -4,2 -4,2 -3,3 -3,3 -4,4 -4,4 -5,3 -5,1 -5,1 -4)),((1 -4,0 -4,0 -1,1 -1,1 -2,2 -2,2 -3,1 -3,1 -4)),((3 -2,4 -2,4 -1,5 -1,5 -4,4 -4,4 -3,3 -3,3 -2)),((3 -2,2 -2,2 -1,1 -1,1 0,4 0,4 -1,3 -1,3 -2)))")
comment:5 by , 4 years ago
full raster cunit output for completeness
-------------- Dependencies -------------- GEOS config: /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/geos/rel-3.9w64/bin/geos-config GEOS version: 3.9.0dev GDAL config: /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/gdal/rel-3.1w64/bin/gdal-config GDAL version: 3.2.0 SFCGAL config: /usr/bin/sfcgal-config SFCGAL version: 1.3.7 PostgreSQL config: /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/pg/rel/pg10w64/bin/pg_config PostgreSQL version: PostgreSQL 10.13 PROJ4 version: 71 Libxml2 config: /usr/bin/xml2-config Libxml2 version: 2.9.10 JSON-C support: yes protobuf support: yes protobuf-c version: 1003003 PCRE support: no Perl: /usr/bin/perl Wagyu: yes
Suite: pixtype Test: test_pixtype_size ...passed Test: test_pixtype_alignment ...passed Test: test_pixtype_name ...passed Test: test_pixtype_index_from_name ...passed Test: test_pixtype_get_min_value ...passed Test: test_pixtype_compare_clamped_values ...passed Suite: raster_basics Test: test_raster_new ...passed Test: test_raster_empty ...passed Test: test_raster_metadata ...passed Test: test_raster_clone ...passed Test: test_raster_from_band ...passed Test: test_raster_replace_band ...passed Suite: band_basics Test: test_band_metadata ...passed Test: test_band_pixtype_1BB ...passed Test: test_band_pixtype_2BUI ...passed Test: test_band_pixtype_4BUI ...passed Test: test_band_pixtype_8BUI ...passed Test: test_band_pixtype_8BSI ...passed Test: test_band_pixtype_16BUI ...passed Test: test_band_pixtype_16BSI ...passed Test: test_band_pixtype_32BUI ...passed Test: test_band_pixtype_32BSI ...passed Test: test_band_pixtype_32BF ...passed Test: test_band_pixtype_64BF ...passed Test: test_band_get_pixel_line ...WARNING: Limiting returning number values to 1 WARNING: Attempting to get pixel values with out of range raster coordinates: (5, 5) passed Test: test_band_new_offline_from_path ...passed Suite: raster_wkb Test: test_raster_wkb ...SRID value -1 converted to the officially unknown SRID value 0 SRID value -1 converted to the officially unknown SRID value 0 SRID value -1 converted to the officially unknown SRID value 0 SRID value -1 converted to the officially unknown SRID value 0 SRID value -1 converted to the officially unknown SRID value 0 SRID value -1 converted to the officially unknown SRID value 0 passed Suite: gdal Test: test_gdal_configured ...passed Test: test_gdal_drivers ...passed Test: test_gdal_rasterize ...passed Test: test_gdal_polygonize ...FAILED 1. cu_gdal.c:180 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"POLYGON((3 1,3 2,2 2,2 3,1 3,1 6,2 6,2 7,3 7,3 8,5 8,5 6,3 6,3 3,4 3,5 3,5 1,3 1))") 2. cu_gdal.c:196 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"POLYGON((0 0,0 9,9 9,9 0,0 0),(6 7,6 8,3 8,3 7,2 7,2 6,1 6,1 3,2 3,2 2,3 2,3 1,6 1,6 2,7 2,7 3,8 3,8 6,7 6,7 7,6 7))") 3. cu_gdal.c:232 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"POLYGON((0 0,0 9,9 9,9 0,0 0),(6 7,6 8,3 8,3 7,2 7,2 6,1 6,1 3,2 3,2 2,3 2,3 1,6 1,6 2,7 2,7 3,8 3,8 6,7 6,7 7,6 7))") 4. cu_gdal.c:260 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"POLYGON((0 0,0 9,9 9,9 0,0 0),(6 7,6 8,3 8,3 7,2 7,2 6,1 6,1 3,2 3,2 2,3 2,3 1,6 1,6 2,7 2,7 3,8 3,8 6,7 6,7 7,6 7))") 5. cu_gdal.c:264 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"POLYGON((3 1,3 2,2 2,2 3,1 3,1 6,2 6,2 7,3 7,3 8,5 8,5 6,3 6,3 3,4 3,5 3,5 1,3 1))") 6. cu_gdal.c:295 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"POLYGON((3 1,3 2,2 2,2 3,1 3,1 6,2 6,2 7,3 7,3 8,5 8,5 6,3 6,3 3,4 3,5 3,5 1,3 1))") 7. cu_gdal.c:327 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"POLYGON((3 1,3 2,2 2,2 3,1 3,1 6,2 6,2 7,3 7,3 8,5 8,5 6,3 6,3 3,4 3,5 3,5 1,3 1))") 8. cu_gdal.c:343 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"POLYGON((0 0,0 9,9 9,9 0,0 0),(6 7,6 8,3 8,3 7,2 7,2 6,1 6,1 3,2 3,2 2,3 2,3 1,6 1,6 2,7 2,7 3,8 3,8 6,7 6,7 7,6 7))") Test: test_raster_to_gdal ...Warning 6: PNG driver doesn't support data type Float64. Only eight bit (Byte) and sixteen bit (UInt16) bands supported. Defaulting to Byte passed Test: test_gdal_to_raster ...passed Test: test_gdal_warp ...passed Suite: raster_geometry Test: test_raster_envelope ...passed Test: test_raster_envelope_geom ...passed Test: test_raster_convex_hull ...passed Test: test_raster_surface ...INFO: Self-intersection at or near point 2 -2 INFO: Self-intersection at or near point 2 -2 FAILED 1. cu_raster_geometry.c:296 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"MULTIPOLYGON(((1 0,1 -1,0 -1,0 -5,4 -5,5 -5,5 0,1 0)))") 2. cu_raster_geometry.c:308 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"MULTIPOLYGON(((1 0,1 -1,0 -1,0 -5,4 -5,5 -5,5 0,1 0),(1 -1,1 -2,2 -2,2 -1,1 -1)))") 3. cu_raster_geometry.c:321 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"MULTIPOLYGON(((1 -1,1 0,5 0,5 -5,4 -5,0 -5,0 -1,1 -1),(1 -1,1 -2,2 -2,2 -1,1 -1),(2 -2,2 -3,3 -3,3 -2,2 -2)))") 4. cu_raster_geometry.c:335 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"MULTIPOLYGON(((1 -1,1 0,5 0,5 -5,4 -5,0 -5,0 -1,1 -1),(1 -1,1 -2,2 -2,2 -1,1 -1),(2 -2,2 -3,3 -3,3 -2,2 -2),(3 -3,3 -4,4 -4,4 -3,3 -3)))") 5. cu_raster_geometry.c:363 - CU_ASSERT_STRING_EQUAL(wkt,"MULTIPOLYGON(((1 -4,2 -4,2 -3,3 -3,3 -4,4 -4,4 -5,3 -5,1 -5,1 -4)),((1 -4,0 -4,0 -1,1 -1,1 -2,2 -2,2 -3,1 -3,1 -4)),((3 -2,4 -2,4 -1,5 -1,5 -4,4 -4,4 -3,3 -3,3 -2)),((3 -2,2 -2,2 -1,1 -1,1 0,4 0,4 -1,3 -1,3 -2)))") Test: test_raster_perimeter ...passed Test: test_raster_pixel_as_polygon ...passed Suite: raster_misc Test: test_raster_cell_to_geopoint ...passed Test: test_raster_geopoint_to_cell ...passed Test: test_raster_from_two_rasters ...passed Test: test_raster_compute_skewed_raster ...passed Suite: band_stats Test: test_band_stats ...passed Test: test_band_value_count ...passed Suite: band_misc Test: test_band_get_nearest_pixel ...passed Test: test_band_get_pixel_of_value ...passed Test: test_pixel_set_to_array ...passed Suite: mapalgebra Test: test_raster_iterator ...passed Test: test_band_reclass ...passed Test: test_raster_colormap ...passed Suite: spatial_relationship Test: test_raster_geos_overlaps ...passed Test: test_raster_geos_touches ...passed Test: test_raster_geos_contains ...passed Test: test_raster_geos_contains_properly ...passed Test: test_raster_geos_covers ...passed Test: test_raster_geos_covered_by ...passed Test: test_raster_within_distance ...passed Test: test_raster_fully_within_distance ...passed Test: test_raster_intersects ...passed Test: test_raster_same_alignment ...passed Suite: misc Test: test_rgb_to_hsv ...passed Test: test_hsv_to_rgb ...passed Test: test_util_gdal_open ...passed Run Summary: Type Total Ran Passed Failed Inactive suites 12 12 n/a 0 0 tests 65 65 63 2 0 asserts 45897 45897 45884 13 n/a
comment:6 by , 4 years ago
I saw other issues with GDAL master too and created https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4715, but without any background on how raster is supposed to work it's hard to know if those are intended/valid changes or not.
comment:7 by , 4 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Seems fixed by https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4734
See also #4679 for 3.0.x.