Opened 13 years ago

Closed 12 years ago

#1122 closed defect (fixed)

exclude raster_columns from being listed in geometry_columns

Reported by: robe Owned by: robe
Priority: medium Milestone: PostGIS 2.0.0
Component: postgis Version: master
Keywords: Cc:


Since raster_columns table has a geometry column, it is appearing automagically in our new spanking geometry_columns view.

It really should be treated as a system table, so we should automagically exclude it.

Change History (6)

comment:1 by robe, 13 years ago

Summary: exclude raster_columns from geometry_columnsexclude raster_columns from being listed in geometry_columns

comment:2 by pracine, 13 years ago

I remember there was another ticket about that…

comment:3 by robe, 13 years ago

Yah it was about the populate_geometry_columns message, but that ticket has been closed and was before geometry_columns was a view and I had said I wouldn't deal with the raster issue until geometry_columns became a view.

comment:4 by strk, 12 years ago

I think it is useful to have the possibility to look at system tables with a GIS client, why making it any harder than it is ?

Do topology tables annoy you as well, btw ?

comment:5 by robe, 12 years ago

no topology tables do not annoy me. Those actually make sense to be listed in geometry_columns because they really are geometry columns you can query like any other and are real bonafied geometry tables. raster_columns is a view now so there is doubly no point in having it listed.

The main issue with raster_columns why it is different and useless to list is that its a mixed bag of mbrs so there is no consistency in the srid. It will always be unknown. I can't think of a reason why a gis client would even care about this column because if they cared about raster, they'd go straight for the raster_columns system catalog and be displaying the extent.

comment:6 by strk, 12 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: newclosed

Convinced ! r8889 does it and regress-tests it.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.