Opened 9 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#3556 closed enhancement (fixed)
Parallelization of Basic raster functions for PostgreSQL 9.6
Reported by: | robe | Owned by: | robe |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | medium | Milestone: | PostGIS 2.3.0 |
Component: | raster | Version: | master |
Keywords: | history | Cc: |
Description
I think a good chunk of functions in PostGIS raster can be parallelized. Particularly the ones like the ST_MapAlgebra, ST_Reclass family that take one raster per row and transform to anothr raster.
Sadly I think the aggregates are a lost cause for 9.6.
Anyrate I'm going to experiment to flag which ones can be marked parallel safe and putting proper costing on them.
Being able to commit this work would hinge on #3549
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Keywords: | history added |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | new → closed |
I'm going to mark this as done. I still have testing to do but that is more of a task than anything.
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
Type: | defect → enhancement |
I thought I had finished this but I see I'm missing some key ones.
comment:5 by , 8 years ago
I'm having some issues getting Parallelization to kick in for raster despite my efforts. geometry looks really good. Still need to test geography.
comment:6 by , 8 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
In 14937: