Opened 15 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#337 closed task (wontfix)
[wktraster] Write online documentation for WKT Raster
Reported by: | pracine | Owned by: | pracine |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | WKTRaster 0.1.6 |
Component: | raster | Version: | master |
Keywords: | Cc: | mloskot |
Description
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Summary: | [wkt raster] Write online documentation → Write online documentation for WKT Raster |
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
comment:3 by , 15 years ago
Summary: | Write online documentation for WKT Raster → [wktraster] Write online documentation for WKT Raster |
---|
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
Priority: | medium → high |
---|
comment:6 by , 15 years ago
Was thinking. Would you guys mind if I started creating an xml file of the functions with examples similar to the PostGIS reference section. By guys I mean WKT Raster folk as well as PostGIS PSC/Developers.
I was thinking of packaging this in with the trunk so it gets put as part of the PostGIS 2.0.0 documentation, but keeping it as a separate file.
Something like wktraster_reference.xml and all the reference ids would be prefixed with RT e.t. RT_ST_AsBinary. Then later on we can merge it in with the rest of reference by like name. Having it follow right after the regular PostGIS reference section for now. I think we have stuff here that is already pretty useful. Just needs some polishing and more exposure. It will be easier to stress test the functions if they are in doc book format and also attract more attention if its part of the main manual. Then have an accompanying raster_comments.sql (separate for now since its not part of core).
Thoughts? If all are agreeable, I can start putting that together.
comment:7 by , 15 years ago
Is really WKT Raster be part of PostGIS 2.0? If yes then it's probably a very good initiative. Otherwise maybe it's a better idea to keep everything together in the wiki.
comment:8 by , 15 years ago
I'm optimistic it will be. The reason I was thinking of keeping it as a separate xml file is that if we don't make the 2.0 wktraster cut, then we can flip it easily into its own standalone manual.
I figure we have 10 months to a year to go before we release 2.0 since some of the stuff we had planned for 2.0 made it to 1.5. I personally see no reason to rush the release of 2.0.
comment:9 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Is it going to be based on DocBook as PostGIS manual or as Wiki?