Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#3069 closed defect (fixed)
Some functions inject a bounding box to POINT geometries
Reported by: | strk | Owned by: | pramsey |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | PostGIS 2.0.7 |
Component: | postgis | Version: | 2.0.x |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
I've found that some functions result in points being equipped with a bounding box cache. I think this should be avoided by policy, shouldn't it ?
Example:
=# select st_summary(ST_FlipCoordinates('POINT(0 0)')); Point[B] =# select st_summary(ST_Reverse('POINT(0 0)')); Point[B] =# select st_summary(postgis_noop('POINT(0 0)'::geometry)); Point[B]
Actually I start thinking if _all_ the functions would be doing that…
Standard input functions, correctly, do not add a bbox cache:
=# select st_summary('POINT(0 0)'::geometry); Point[] =# select st_summary(st_geomfromtext('POINT(0 0)')); Point[]
I've tested 1.5 and it is NOT affected. 2.0 branch is affected. I'm considering this high because grows the size of POINT layers by a big amount (48 bytes instead of 21 for a 2D point)
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
sfcgal version of tickets_expected also needs update (dunno why we have that duplication)
comment:5 by , 10 years ago
sfcgal/tickets .. failed (diff expected obtained: /tmp/pgis_reg/test_113_diff) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- sfcgal/tickets_expected 2015-03-04 18:28:21.195446506 +0100 +++ /tmp/pgis_reg/test_113_out 2015-03-05 19:01:49.646941614 +0100 @@ -201,9 +201,9 @@ #1398a|POINT(-119.093153 45.632669) #1398b|POINT(-160.137654 77.091608) #1543|MULTILINESTRING((0 0,10 0,10 10,0 0),(0 0))|POLYGON((0 0,10 10,10 0,0 0)) -#1580.1|Point[BS] +#1580.1|Point[S] ERROR: transform: couldn't project point (180 90 0): tolerance condition error (-20) -#1580.3|Point[BS] +#1580.3|Point[S] #1596.1|public.road_pg.roads_geom SRID:3395 TYPE:POINT DIMS:2 ERROR: invalid SRID: 330000 not found in spatial_ref_sys #1596.3|3395 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
comment:6 by , 10 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
2.1 and trunk (2.2) also affected