Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#2226 closed defect (wontfix)
[raster]: Regress failure on window 8.4 32-bit
Reported by: | robe | Owned by: | dustymugs |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | PostGIS 2.0.4 |
Component: | raster | Version: | 2.0.x |
Keywords: | windows | Cc: |
Description
I was really hoping I'd never have to look at 8.4 again. Oh well. In packaging 8.4 PostGIS 2.0 for windows, running into a regress issue:
PostgreSQL 8.4.8, compiled by Visual C++ build 1400, 32-bit Postgis 2.0.3 - r11128 - 2013-03-10 21:50:06 GEOS: 3.3.8-CAPI-1.7.8 PROJ: Rel. 4.8.0, 6 March 2012 GDAL: GDAL 1.9.1, released 2012/05/15 Running tests check_gdal .. ok check_raster_columns .. ok check_raster_overviews .. ok rt_io .. ok rt_bytea .. ok box3d .. ok rt_addband .. ok rt_band .. ok rt_asgdalraster .. ok rt_astiff .. ok rt_asjpeg .. ok rt_aspng .. ok rt_union .. ok create_rt_properties_test .. ok rt_dimensions .. ok rt_scale .. ok rt_pixelsize .. ok rt_upperleft .. ok rt_rotation .. ok rt_georeference .. ok rt_set_properties .. ok drop_rt_properties_test .. ok create_rt_empty_raster_test .. ok rt_isempty .. ok rt_hasnoband .. ok drop_rt_empty_raster_test .. ok rt_metadata .. ok create_rt_band_properties_test .. ok rt_band_properties .. ok rt_set_band_properties .. ok rt_summarystats .. ok rt_count .. ok rt_histogram .. ok rt_quantile .. ok rt_valuecount .. ok rt_valuepercent .. ok rt_bandmetadata .. ok rt_pixelvalue .. ok drop_rt_band_properties_test .. ok rt_utility .. ok create_rt_mapalgebra_test .. ok rt_mapalgebraexpr .. ok rt_mapalgebrafct .. ok rt_mapalgebraexpr_2raster .. ok rt_mapalgebrafct_2raster .. ok drop_rt_mapalgebra_test .. ok create_rt_mapalgebrafctngb_test .. ok rt_mapalgebrafctngb .. ok rt_mapalgebrafctngb_userfunc .. ok drop_rt_mapalgebrafctngb_test .. ok rt_reclass .. ok rt_resample .. failed (diff expected obtained: /tmp/pgis_reg/test_52_diff) rt_asraster .. failed (diff expected obtained: /tmp/pgis_reg/test_53_diff) rt_intersection .. ok rt_clip .. ok create_rt_gist_test .. ok rt_above .. ok rt_below .. ok rt_contained .. ok rt_contain .. ok rt_left .. ok rt_overabove .. ok rt_overbelow .. ok rt_overlap .. ok rt_overleft .. ok rt_overright .. ok rt_right .. ok rt_same .. ok drop_rt_gist_test .. ok rt_spatial_relationship .. ok rt_intersects .. ok rt_samealignment .. ok bug_test_car5 .. ok tickets .. ok loader/Basic ...... ok loader/BasicCopy ...... ok loader/Tiled10x10 ..... ok loader/Tiled10x10Copy ..... ok uninstall ... ok (3699)
It's possible this affects all 8.4's since neigther winnie nor debbie test against PostgreSQL 8.4.
Regress failures attached. I'm going to upgrade the gdal version to 1.9.2 to see if that fixes.
Attachments (1)
Change History (11)
by , 12 years ago
Attachment: | pgis_reg_pg84_windows_203.zip added |
---|
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
comment:3 by , 12 years ago
I think there is a Windows issue. On Linux 64 with PostgreSQL 8.4, GDAL 1.9.2 and PostGIS 2.0-svn, I have no regression issues.
comment:4 by , 12 years ago
Weird. My others 9.0-9.2 (both 32-bit and 64-bit) regressed cleanly.
Which microversion of 8.4 are you running?
comment:5 by , 12 years ago
Keywords: | windows added |
---|
comment:8 by , 12 years ago
unfortunately it didn't, but I don't think too many folks are using 8.4 on windows anymore and if they are they are probably too shy to upgrade their PostGIS to 2.0. Even ArcGIS 10 seems to work happily with my PostGIS 2.1.0 install.
comment:9 by , 12 years ago
Checking the changelog for 2.0, nothing has changed between 2.0.2 and 2.0.3 and that regress file has been the same from when branch 2.0 was created. Based upon the regress output, it looks like the transformation between SRSes is not taking place. How was GDAL built?
comment:10 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I honestly don't care about 8.4 to even bother checking if there is an issue. don't know any windows user that still uses it with 2.0.
nope fails with 9.2. I vaguely remember having this issue when I had my proj env setting snot set right. Thought they seem to be.