Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
#2048 closed defect (fixed)
Regress failure for 9.0
| Reported by: | robe | Owned by: | pracine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | PostGIS 2.1.0 |
| Component: | raster | Version: | master |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Output from winnie
Running tests check_gdal .. ok check_raster_columns .. ok check_raster_overviews .. ok rt_io .. ok rt_bytea .. ok box3d .. ok rt_addband .. ok rt_band .. ok rt_dimensions .. ok rt_scale .. ok rt_pixelsize .. ok rt_upperleft .. ok rt_rotation .. ok rt_georeference .. ok rt_set_properties .. ok rt_isempty .. ok rt_hasnoband .. ok rt_metadata .. ok rt_raster2worldcoord .. ok rt_world2rastercoord .. ok rt_above .. ok rt_below .. ok rt_contained .. ok rt_contain .. ok rt_left .. ok rt_overabove .. ok rt_overbelow .. ok rt_overlap .. ok rt_overleft .. ok rt_overright .. ok rt_right .. ok rt_same .. ok rt_band_properties .. ok rt_set_band_properties .. ok rt_setvalues_array .. ok rt_summarystats .. ok rt_count .. ok rt_histogram .. ok rt_quantile .. ok rt_valuecount .. ok rt_valuepercent .. ok rt_bandmetadata .. ok rt_pixelvalue .. ok rt_neighborhood .. ok rt_nearestvalue .. ok rt_pixelofvalue .. ok rt_pixelaspolygons .. ok rt_pixelaspoints .. ok rt_pixelascentroids .. ok rt_polygon .. ok rt_utility .. ok rt_asgdalraster .. ok rt_astiff .. ok rt_asjpeg .. ok rt_aspng .. ok rt_reclass .. ok rt_resample .. ok rt_asraster .. ok rt_mapalgebraexpr .. ok rt_mapalgebrafct .. ok rt_mapalgebraexpr_2raster .. ok rt_mapalgebrafct_2raster .. ok rt_mapalgebrafctngb .. ok rt_mapalgebrafctngb_userfunc .. ok rt_intersection .. ok rt_clip .. ok rt_mapalgebra .. failed (diff expected obtained: /c/jenkins/postgis/tmp/2.1.0SVN_pg9.0w64/test_67_diff) rt_union .. ok rt_invdistweight4ma .. ok rt_4ma .. ok rt_intersects .. ok rt_overlaps .. ok rt_touches .. ok rt_contains .. ok rt_containsproperly .. ok rt_covers .. ok rt_coveredby .. ok rt_within .. ok rt_disjoint .. ok rt_dwithin .. ok rt_dfullywithin .. ok rt_samealignment .. ok bug_test_car5 .. ok tickets .. ok loader/Basic ..... ok loader/BasicCopy ..... ok loader/Tiled10x10 .... ok loader/Tiled10x10Copy .... ok uninstall .. ok (3740 ) Run tests: 89 Failed: 1
Same failure from Debbie:
See attached output from winnie
Attachments (1)
Change History (6)
by , 12 years ago
| Attachment: | 2.1.0SVN_pg9.0w64_regress_failure.zip added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
Bborie,
If this proves difficult to fix, I'm proposing we drop 9.0 support for 2.1.
I know we said we would only drop 8.4, but I suspect the large majority of users will be using 9.1, 9.2, or 9.3 with 2.1. That will selfishly allow me to make extension the official model for installation for 2.1 
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
Give me a day or two to see what I can do to fix that "ERROR: could not implement GROUP BY". That "GROUP BY" regression test would be very useful capability…
comment:3 by , 12 years ago
*Sigh* So it looks like PostgreSQL 9.1 is the old version that permits the GROUP BY using HASH opclass. So, I've added code for 9.0 that achieves the same result using the same function but with an additional step. Changes committed in r10429.
comment:4 by , 12 years ago
As for dropping 9.0 for 2.1, I have to vote no. This is purely because I don't want to upgrade my production database server from 9.0 yet. Not until 9.3 is release. 
winnie output