#721 closed task (fixed)
add pycsw to LiveDVD
Reported by: | tomkralidis | Owned by: | camerons |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | OSGeoLive | Keywords: | pycsw, 5.5 |
Cc: | kalxas, live-demo@… |
Description
Per: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/live-demo/2011-May/003420.html
FYI pycsw is an optional install at this point.
Angelos has committed the install script in r6133 (pycsw 0.1.0).
As discussed, I will create overview and quickstart .rst files.
Attachments (5)
Change history (15)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by
Keywords: | 5.0 added |
---|
Changed 10 years ago by
Attachment: | pycsw_quickstart.rst added |
---|
Changed 10 years ago by
Attachment: | pycsw_tester.PNG added |
---|
Changed 10 years ago by
Attachment: | pycsw_getcapabilities_response.PNG added |
---|
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by
Priority: | normal → major |
---|
thanks. quickstart added in svn, built versions can be previewed here:
main entry commented out in the Contents page pending review.
Hamish
Changed 10 years ago by
Attachment: | pycsw_overview.patch added |
---|
Changed 10 years ago by
Attachment: | pycsw_quickstart.patch added |
---|
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 10 years ago by
FYI please patch the overview and quickstart docs for pycsw per the .patch files submitted.
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by
Replying to tomkralidis:
FYI please patch the overview and quickstart docs for pycsw per the .patch files submitted.
patch applied.
Hamish
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by
As per my original email:
On 27/04/11 18:34, Cameron Shorter wrote:
My initial feeling is that it would be great to include pywcs in a future release of OSGeo-Live, but as pywcs is still only at a 0.1 release, without wide uptake yet, it is premature to include pywcs into the next OSGeo-Live release.
I believe that we have developed a reputation that if an application has been deployed on OSGeo-Live, then someone can expect that it has been deployed in many different locations, and tested by many different organisations. Hence, users can be confident that they will be unlikely to uncover any bugs by running standard operations.
Feel free to suggest that I have mis-read the project, or argue otherwise.
As such, I feel that pycsw should not be linked into the Overview docs for this release. I also note that the docs have not been reviewed, or presented to translators for translating, which is another reason I'm against including pycsw at this late stage of the release cycle.
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by
Priority: | major → normal |
---|
pycsw is present on the Live RC5 - but the pycsw permissions are not set in /var/www/pycsw to allow web-serving
comment:8 Changed 9 years ago by
Keywords: | 5.5 added; 5.0 removed |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from tomkralidis to camerons |
pycsw has moved to version 1.0, and will be going live in release osgeolive 5.5.
comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by
Cc: | live-demo@… added |
---|
Hi,
when assigning ownership of a bug in trac please remember to move the ML address into the cc field, otherwise the conversation is only seen by those who have posted to the ticket.
thanks, Hamish
pycsw added to the build, but is not listed on the Contents list as no quickstart exists for it yet.
Hamish