Opened 18 months ago
Closed 14 months ago
#2279 closed defect (fixed)
rasdaman demo fails
Reported by: | kalxas | Owned by: | pebau |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | critical | Milestone: | OSGeoLive14.0 |
Component: | OSGeoLive | Keywords: | |
Cc: | osgeolive@…, d.misev@…, b.phamhuu@… |
Description
During the OSGeo Virtual Code Sprint we discussed about moving large projects to VM only.
rasdaman is a candidate
Change history (32)
comment:1 by , 18 months ago
comment:2 by , 18 months ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 18 months ago
We are planning to release 2 versions of OSGeoLive 14.0:
- the iso version (live system) that has a hard 4GB disk space limit.
- the vm version without a disk limit.
the current iso has already reached the 4GB size and we are going to leave some projects out. During the OSGeo Virtual Code sprint we had a project meeting and set some candidates through internal discussion. Criteria included disk size, update rate, team responsiveness, OSGeo status etc.
comment:4 by , 18 months ago
Replying to kalxas:
During the OSGeo Virtual Code sprint we had a project meeting and set some candidates through internal discussion. Criteria included disk size, update rate, team responsiveness, OSGeo status etc.
So, for the sake of transparency, asking again: where can we see the criteria and the projects under discussion? Thanks.
comment:5 by , 18 months ago
comment:7 by , 18 months ago
Disk size of installed projects is available as a graph (disk_usage_plot.png) in the following links:
http://aiolos.survey.ntua.gr/gisvm/13.0/osgeolive-13.0-amd64-log.tar.gz
http://aiolos.survey.ntua.gr/gisvm/14.0/osgeolive-14.0alpha2-amd64-log.tar.gz
comment:8 by , 18 months ago
In the 14.0alpha2 I don't see anything about rasdaman, neither in the build log nor the disk usage graph. It seems install_rasdaman.sh is not executed at all?
comment:9 by , 18 months ago
rasdaman is available in the latest iso and is not working currently.
http://aiolos.survey.ntua.gr/gisvm/dev/osgeolive-nightly-build147-amd64-4955d89-master.iso
http://aiolos.survey.ntua.gr/gisvm/dev/osgeolive-nightly-build147-amd64-4955d89-master-log.tar.gz
please review.
comment:10 by , 18 months ago
thank you, I see the size now. I believe we can do something to shrink the footprint, please stay tuned.
comment:11 by , 17 months ago
rasdaman works fine aside of some strange warnings about tomcat9 during installation, but the rasdaman-demo was gone from our server so couldn't be downloaded. I fixed this.
comment:12 by , 17 months ago
I submitted a pull request that reduces the installed size by almost 300 MB: https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/pull/292
comment:14 by , 17 months ago
comment:15 by , 17 months ago
Did you have an opportunity to test Dimitar's change? Cannot find rasdaman on alpha3 although it is way below several others now. Hope with the shrinking now rasdaman remains in the selection, can you confirm? Anything else we can do?
comment:16 by , 17 months ago
...and, as always: thanks for your huge effort invested with every version! I am aware this means herding lots of diverse cats.
follow-up: 18 comment:17 by , 17 months ago
Dimitar's change has been tested in a pre-alpha3 build:
http://aiolos.survey.ntua.gr/gisvm/dev/osgeolive-nightly-build190-amd64-9db2bd5-rasdaman.iso
http://aiolos.survey.ntua.gr/gisvm/dev/osgeolive-nightly-build190-amd64-9db2bd5-rasdaman-log.tar.gz
It did not seems to work when I tested, can you please test and confirm the status?
Also, rasdaman script appears to remove stuff from the disk now instead of adding, check the disk log graph...
comment:18 by , 17 months ago
Replying to kalxas:
It did not seems to work when I tested, can you please test and confirm the status?
ok we will look into it right after Xmas vacation and come back.
Also, rasdaman script appears to remove stuff from the disk now instead of adding, check the disk log graph...
Indeed, it confuses me to see negative numbers; what is the zero line indicating, actually?
comment:19 by , 17 months ago
Also, rasdaman script appears to remove stuff from the disk now instead of adding, check the disk log graph...
Maybe because I added the apt-get clean
to our install script? Not sure what else could cause this.
comment:20 by , 17 months ago
Having negative number in the disk usage chart means that the installer removes more stuff from the disk than it adds. Cleanup should only happen at setdown.sh I will remove autoclean and try again.
comment:21 by , 17 months ago
We have a problem with the GDAL on the ISO:
libgdal-java
is the standard Ubuntu 20.04 version 3.0.4, but the rest of GDAL libs and tools is 3.2.0. So there's an incompatibility I guess, which causes errors in applications that use libgdal-java
, rasdaman gets this bogus error:
java.lang.RuntimeException: OGR Error: General Error
comment:22 by , 17 months ago
@kalxas in summary, libgdal-java needs to be added to the nightly osgeo repo too.
comment:23 by , 17 months ago
With the latest update of install_rasdaman.sh, installed size of rasdaman is 161 MB.
comment:25 by , 17 months ago
I tested the iso and it works well.
So rasdaman has reduced installation size to 161 MB, which puts it somewhere in the middle among all applications on the iso. I think it's reasonable to remove it from consideration of moving to VM only, seeing there are many heavier apps in front now, and close this ticket.
comment:26 by , 17 months ago
Thanks, I will build a new iso with rasdaman enabled to see what is the disk status and report back
comment:27 by , 17 months ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
rasdaman is now available in nightly builds
comment:28 by , 17 months ago
I have updated to green at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMlM8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit#gid=961883678
comment:29 by , 14 months ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
I just tested 14.0rc1 iso: Rasdaman fails to start from the menu launcher. The error is "user not able to write in /opt/rasdaman/logs" After changing the folder permissions rasdaman starts but still the demo application does not work properly.
@misev can you please test?
comment:30 by , 14 months ago
Summary: | rasdaman to be moved to vm only? → rasdaman demo fails |
---|---|
Type: | task → defect |
comment:31 by , 14 months ago
comment:32 by , 14 months ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
can you share more details please?