#800 closed enhancement (fixed)
Request for change in the ajax viewer - legend with selectability
Reported by: | bscott | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | medium | Milestone: | 2.1 |
Component: | AJAX Viewer | Version: | 2.0.2 |
Severity: | trivial | Keywords: | |
Cc: | External ID: |
Description
Motivation Selection is something very centric in many custom applications. So it must be fast and easy to use. It is sometimes pretty difficult to select point features or to select many polygons object when there is other polygons under them.
So i would like to propose to add a new icon in the legend to be able to toggle the selectability of each layers.
There's a nabble thread http://www.nabble.com/Request-for-change-in-the-ajax-viewer---legend-with-selectability-td20837203.html
Attachments (2)
Change History (7)
by , 16 years ago
Attachment: | patch _selectability_icons.zip added |
---|
by , 16 years ago
Attachment: | patch_selectability.patch added |
---|
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
I agree that this is a nice fix, but after looking at the screen cap in the discussion above it seems that the "arrow icon" added above is not very intuitive (i.e., I don't see the visual affordance for what it does). Or is that icon pretty standard and I'm not aware of it?
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
You mean the "arrow icon" doesn't really convey that the layer is selectable/not selectable?
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
Sorry for the late response... yes, that is what I am saying. Let's put this in front of some of our users and see what they think. Have we done this?
comment:5 by , 15 years ago
I should be more specific...let's put it in front of some of our viewer users...in the worst case, these are those who only know how to browse the web and might have used Google maps and some other Internet applications. My guess is that they will be confused by this icon if it is presented.
Maybe we need a way to turn it off (that is, don't display it)?
Fixed in r3764. Thanks for the patch Bruno, this is really useful!