Opened 16 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
#667 closed enhancement (fixed)
please allow to export projection information in more formats
Reported by: | timmie | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 6.5.0 |
Component: | Default | Version: | svn-develbranch6 |
Keywords: | g.proj, g.region | Cc: | |
CPU: | x86-32 | Platform: | Linux |
Description
There are several modules which print region or projection information: g.region, g.proj, etc.
Please add the following output formats:
- EPSG code
- GMT format
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
follow-up: 3 comment:2 by , 16 years ago
Component: | Compiling → default |
---|---|
Keywords: | g.proj added |
Milestone: | 6.4.0 → 6.5.0 |
Type: | defect → enhancement |
THis is only appropriate for g.proj. see other tickets regarding storing +proj string in the WKT of v.out.ogr and r.out.gdal maps. EPSG number is expanded, it's not really a reverable process (e.g. datum transform params can be added after).
Also, what does GMT format look like?
Hamish
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 16 years ago
Replying to hamish:
THis is only appropriate for g.proj. see other tickets regarding storing +proj string in the WKT of v.out.ogr and r.out.gdal maps.
OK.
EPSG number is expanded, it's not really a reverable process (e.g. datum transform params can be added after).
But difficult at time when you want to reproject data outside GRASS with gdal or ogr based on EPSG number.
Also, what does GMT format look like?
It's like:
-JB-100/35/33/45/6i
May aim with this proposal is to ease the process of sharing projection information. proj4 has its format which can be printed by GRASS. ESRI hat its format which can be saved by v.out.ogr GMT have another format... So I though that EPSG would unify this a bit.
comment:4 by , 16 years ago
Also, what does GMT format look like?
It's like:
-JB-100/35/33/45/6i
I'm not sure what the -JB
and /6i
are for
-R xmin, xmax, ymin, and ymax specify the Region of interest. For geographic regions, these limits correspond to west, east, south, and north and you may specify them in decimal degrees or in [+-]dd:mm[:ss.xxx][W|E|S|N] format. Append r if lower left and upper right map coordinates are given instead of wesn. The two shorthands -Rg -Rd stand for global domain (0/360 or -180/+180 in longitude respec- tively, with -90/+90 in latitude).
they use the same D:M:S format as us, should be pretty easy to add a new -t flag for that... standby.
Hamish
comment:5 by , 16 years ago
comment:6 by , 16 years ago
Thanks.
Do you not think that the format +proj=longlat +ellps=WGS84 +datum=WGS84 +no_defs
or GEOGCS["WGS 84",
DATUM["WGS_1984",
SPHEROID["WGS 84",6378137,298.257223563,
AUTHORITY["EPSG","7030"]],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","6326"]],
PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,
AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
UNIT["degree",0.01745329251994328,
AUTHORITY["EPSG","9122"]],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","4326"]]
cannot be converted back to the corresponding EPSG number?
Here are some python modules that may help us: http://mateusz.loskot.net/software/gis/pyepsglookup/ http://pyproj.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/README.html
comment:7 by , 16 years ago
Do you not think that the format +proj=longlat +ellps=WGS84 +datum=WGS84
...
cannot be converted back to the corresponding EPSG number?
adding datum transform parameters is a non-reversible process. likely there is precision and other translation/expansion issues as well. Neither Frank's EPSG DB -> PROJ.4 epsg file nor QGIS's +proj4 term matching code has a solution yet, and that's before you consider that we maintain our own ellipse and datum tables which may add and/or modify terms.
I don't want to say it can't be done, but it's not easy and I would not trust well any result which claims to be able do it to be complete. IMHO better to just use the explicit expanded version and not worry..
Hamish
comment:8 by , 16 years ago
There are 2 cases where I think the EPSG code can be stored and later printed: 1) location wizard -> create location with EPSG code => the code is entered by the user. it can be stored by GRASS 2) location wizard -> create location with georeferenced file => the code is mostely retrived by gdalinfo or ogrinfo.
comment:9 by , 13 years ago
For keeping track of the EPSG code used to create the location, try r49298 in trunk.
NOTE: The EPSG code is preserved for historical metadata interest only; the contents of this file are not used by pj_*() routines at all. The PROJ_INFO file contains the active projection parameters; to avoid conflicts of consistency this term should not be mixed into that file or used in its place. (e.g. the epsg code typically does not define datum transform parameters, or in the case of current PROJ 4.7.1svn's copy it can contain incorrect datum transform terms)
Hamish
comment:10 by , 13 years ago
Keywords: | g.region added |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | new → closed |
printing the region in GMT style was already accomplished with 'g.region -t'. (see comment:5)
Hamish
An example for formats of interest is at: http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4326/