Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#3758 closed defect (fixed)
zstd-suport in GRASS >= 7.6: update manuals for variables and r.compress
Reported by: | sbl | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 7.6.1 |
Component: | Docs | Version: | svn-releasebranch76 |
Keywords: | r.compress, variables | Cc: | |
CPU: | All | Platform: | All |
Description
The release news for GRASS 7.6: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/Release/7.6.0-News , say that new default raster compressor (if available) is ZSTD.
Manuals for:
- variables (https://grass.osgeo.org/grass76/manuals/variables.html)
- r.compress (https://grass.osgeo.org/grass76/manuals/r.compress.html)
- ???
are not fully consistent/up to date in this regards and should be updated accordingly...
Attachments (1)
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
follow-up: 4 comment:3 by , 6 years ago
Thanks. Found one little glitch (see attached diff for a suggestion). BTW., the manual for r.compress (https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/raster/r.compress/r.compress.html?rev=74114#L98) says:
The NULL file compression is using the LZ4 method as being the best compromise between speed and compression rate.
Is that still accurate?
comment:4 by , 6 years ago
Replying to sbl:
Thanks. Found one little glitch (see attached diff for a suggestion).
Thanks, applied in trunk r74119. You can of course submit these improvements yourself ;-)
BTW., the manual for r.compress (https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/raster/r.compress/r.compress.html?rev=74114#L98) says:
The NULL file compression is using the LZ4 method as being the best compromise between speed and compression rate.Is that still accurate?
Yes, there is practically no speed penalty with LZ4, and NULL files are so simple that not much is gained with other compression methods.
comment:5 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Thanks for clarification.
Yes, next time I open tickets esp. on documentation I try to come up with a fix myself much faster. (But you make it hard to be fast enough ;-))
Closing as fixed.
In 74114: