Opened 16 years ago
Last modified 9 years ago
#247 new defect
m.proj: mind that if input points are XYZ rather than XY, cs2cs will include Z in transfomartion
Reported by: | msieczka | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 6.4.6 |
Component: | Projections/Datums | Version: | svn-develbranch6 |
Keywords: | m.proj | Cc: | |
CPU: | All | Platform: | All |
Description
Take for example such 3 points (Z is elevation a.s.l. in meters):
16 52 64 16.00083333 52 63 16.00166667 52 62
The source CRS is:
+proj=longlat +ellps=krass +towgs84=33.4,-146.6,-76.3,-0.359,-0.053,0.844,-0.84
and target CRS:
+proj=tmerc +lat_0=0 +lon_0=19 +k=0.9993 +x_0=500000 +y_0=-5300000 +ellps=GRS80 +units=m
As the datums differ, cs2cs (m.proj) result will differ depending if Z is included or not in the input, because cs2cs takes the Z coordinate for ellipsoidal height. Since my Z coordinate is a.s.l., not ellipsoidal, this will introduce an error.
cs2cs result when Z is there in the input:
568525.00043548 5761469.34143594 103.09038265 568582.20740863 5761470.12874655 102.08903865 568639.41506476 5761470.91672242 101.08769464
And without Z:
568524.99893752 5761469.34103610 39.09043643 568582.20593408 5761470.12835296 39.08909159 568639.41361362 5761470.91633507 39.08774674
There is a slight difference in XY, which one might argue is neglectable, yet the bogus Z transformation might get the user into real trouble if he still treats the data as 3D after transformation.
There was a similar issue in v.proj with 3D data, and it was solved by adding a switch, but this can't be done for m.proj because there is no way in cs2cs to prevent it from processing the Z coord in input.
m.proj should propably refuse to process data with more than 2 columns.
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
Milestone: | 6.4.0 → 6.4.4 |
---|
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
Component: | Vector → Projections/Datums |
---|---|
Keywords: | m.proj added |
Priority: | major → normal |
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
Milestone: | 6.4.4 → 6.4.6 |
---|