Opened 11 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#2350 closed defect (worksforme)
G7: r.texture large file support problem
| Reported by: | neteler | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 7.0.7 |
| Component: | Raster | Version: | unspecified |
| Keywords: | LFS, r.texture | Cc: | |
| CPU: | x86-64 | Platform: | Linux |
Description
There seems to be a large file support issue under certain (?) circumstances:
# Scientific Linux, 64bit:
# region size: 156044800 cells
r.texture input=pca_43140.1 prefix=pca_43140.1 \
size=9 distance=1 method=asm,se,var
...
Reading raster map...
Calculating 3 texture measures
WARNING: Unable to rename null file
'/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/.tmp/blade21/2161.1' to
'/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/cell_misc/x43140_2006_pca.1_ASM/null'
WARNING: Unable to rename cell file
'/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/.tmp/blade21/2161.0' to
'/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/fcell/x43140_2006_pca.1_ASM'
WARNING: Unable to write quant rules: raster map <x43140_2006_pca.1_ASM> is
integer
WARNING: Unable to rename null file
'/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/.tmp/blade21/2161.3' to
'/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/cell_misc/x43140_2006_pca.1_Var/null'
WARNING: Unable to rename cell file
'/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/.tmp/blade21/2161.2' to
'/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/fcell/x43140_2006_pca.1_Var'
WARNING: Unable to write quant rules: raster map <x43140_2006_pca.1_Var> is
integer
WARNING: Unable to rename null file
'/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/.tmp/blade21/2161.5' to
'/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/cell_misc/x43140_2006_pca.1_SE/null'
WARNING: Unable to rename cell file
'/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/.tmp/blade21/2161.4' to
'/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/fcell/x43140_2006_pca.1_SE'
WARNING: Unable to write quant rules: raster map <x43140_2006_pca.1_SE> is
integer
Result (failure):
r.info x43140_2006_pca.1_ASM +---------------------------------------------------------------- | Layer: x43140_2006_pca.1_ASM Date: Tue Jun 24 17:17:35 2014 | Mapset: alba_classification Login of Creator: lucadelu | Location: patUTM32 ... | | Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 0 | Data Type: CELL | Rows: 11680 | Columns: 13360 | Total Cells: 156044800 | Projection: UTM (zone 32) | N: 5124056.897747 S: 5118216.897747 Res: 0.5 | E: 667131.354793 W: 660451.354793 Res: 0.5 | Range of data: min = -2147483648 max = -2147483648 ...
Using a different machine, it worked fine:
# Ubuntu 14 64 bit machine: GRASS 7.0.0svn (Trento-landchange):~ > r.info pca_43140.1_ASM +-------------------------------------------------------------- | Layer: pca_43140.1_ASM Date: Wed Jun 25 15:04:01 2014 ... | Title: ( pca_43140.1_ASM ) ... | Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 0 | Data Type: FCELL | Rows: 11680 | Columns: 13360 | Total Cells: 156044800 | Projection: UTM (zone 32) | N: 5124056.897747 S: 5118216.897747 Res: 0.5 | E: 667131.354793 W: 660451.354793 Res: 0.5 | Range of data: min = 0.00737847 max = 1 ...
I am not sure what to look for now, suggestions?
Is r.texture supporting LFS?
Change History (8)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 11 years ago
follow-up: 3 comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Replying to glynn:
Replying to neteler:
There seems to be a large file support issue under certain (?) circumstances:
Why do you believe that this is related to LFS?
I got the idea from
Range of data: min = -2147483648 max = -2147483648
...
These warnings are generated by Rast_close() or Rast_unopen(), and correspond to a rename() system call failing.
Would it be possible to make the errno more visible or "clear"?
Possible reasons for failure are listed in the rename(2) manual page, but the most likely reason is filesystem permissions. Ensure that you own all of the directories within the mapset, and that the owner has write permission on them.
Yes, I checked and the mapset owner has write permissions. So, the situation is this:
/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification - /grassdata/ is mounted to the actual blade (cluster system) via NFS - /grassdata/patUTM32/: I am owner of that, group write is set - /grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/: owned by the user having problems
This setting we use for years without troubles.
If you're using group-writeable mapsets (suppressing the mapset ownership check), be aware that a user having bit 0020 (group-write) set in their umask will cause this sort of issue
Here the various permissions:
[neteler@blade21 ~]$ ls -la /grassdata lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Mar 3 2012 /grassdata -> /storage/2/grassdata/ [neteler@blade21 ~]$ ls -la /grassdata/ | grep patUTM drwxrwxr-x 97 neteler gis 4096 Jun 23 16:23 patUTM32/ [neteler@blade21 ~]$ ls -la /grassdata/patUTM32/ | grep alba drwxr-xr-x 14 lucadelu gis 4096 Jun 25 12:24 alba_classification/ [neteler@blade21 ~]$ ls -la /grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/ total 4260 drwxr-xr-x 14 lucadelu gis 4096 Jun 25 12:24 ./ drwxrwxr-x 97 neteler gis 4096 Jun 23 16:23 ../ -rw------- 1 lucadelu gis 1817 Jun 24 16:05 .bash_history -rw-r--r-- 1 lucadelu gis 886 Jun 24 15:41 .bashrc drwx------ 2 lucadelu gis 4096 Jun 25 17:17 cats/ drwx------ 2 lucadelu gis 4096 Jun 25 17:17 cell/ drwx------ 2 lucadelu gis 4096 Jun 25 17:17 cellhd/ drwx------ 47 lucadelu gis 4096 Jun 25 17:17 cell_misc/ drwx------ 2 lucadelu gis 4096 Jun 25 17:11 colr/ -rw------- 1 lucadelu gis 12 Jun 23 16:15 CURGROUP drwx------ 2 lucadelu gis 4096 Jun 25 17:17 fcell/ drwx------ 2 lucadelu gis 10 Jun 23 16:15 g3dcell/ drwx------ 10 lucadelu gis 4096 Jun 23 16:15 group/ drwx------ 2 lucadelu gis 4096 Jun 25 17:17 hist/ -rw------- 1 lucadelu gis 70 Jun 24 09:57 legend -rw-r--r-- 1 lucadelu gis 4264511 Jun 25 17:17 logfile -rw-r--r-- 1 lucadelu gis 9916 Jun 24 17:18 logfile_size9 -rw-r--r-- 1 lucadelu gis 6810 Jun 25 15:14 method.py drwx------ 2 lucadelu gis 30 Jun 25 15:56 sqlite/ drwxr-xr-x 3 lucadelu gis 28 Jun 24 17:17 .tmp/ -rw------- 1 lucadelu gis 81 Jun 23 16:15 VAR drwx------ 9 lucadelu gis 4096 Jun 25 15:53 vector/ -rw------- 1 lucadelu gis 355 Jun 25 17:11 WIND
(subdirectories created by commands run by that user won't be writeable by anyone else, resulting in maps which cannot be overwritten or removed). This is a large part of the reason why the mapset ownership check exists.
Not sure yet if above cited permissions cause the error?
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Replying to neteler:
Why do you believe that this is related to LFS?
I got the idea from
Range of data: min = -2147483648 max = -2147483648
LFS issues wouldn't (directly) cause this. -2147483648 is -231 = INT_MIN = (int)0x80000000. I believe that it arises from casting a double to an int where the value isn't representable as an int:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
double x = 1.0e12;
double y = 0.0 / 0.0;
printf("%g %d\n", x, (int) x);
printf("%g %d\n", y, (int) y);
return 0;
}
produces:
1e+12 -2147483648 -nan -2147483648
These warnings are generated by Rast_close() or Rast_unopen(), and correspond to a rename() system call failing.
Would it be possible to make the errno more visible or "clear"?
Try r61048.
Here the various permissions:
What are the permissions and ownership for
/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/.tmp/blade21 /grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/cell_misc/*
?
comment:4 by , 9 years ago
| Milestone: | 7.0.0 → 7.0.5 |
|---|
comment:5 by , 8 years ago
| Milestone: | 7.0.5 → 7.0.6 |
|---|
comment:6 by , 7 years ago
| Milestone: | 7.0.6 → 7.0.7 |
|---|
Replying to neteler:
Why do you believe that this is related to LFS?
WARNING: Unable to rename null file '/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/.tmp/blade21/2161.1' to '/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/cell_misc/x43140_2006_pca.1_ASM/null' WARNING: Unable to rename cell file '/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/.tmp/blade21/2161.0' to '/grassdata/patUTM32/alba_classification/fcell/x43140_2006_pca.1_ASM'These warnings are generated by Rast_close() or Rast_unopen(), and correspond to a rename() system call failing.
Possible reasons for failure are listed in the rename(2) manual page, but the most likely reason is filesystem permissions. Ensure that you own all of the directories within the mapset, and that the owner has write permission on them.
If you're using group-writeable mapsets (suppressing the mapset ownership check), be aware that a user having bit 0020 (group-write) set in their umask will cause this sort of issue (subdirectories created by commands run by that user won't be writeable by anyone else, resulting in maps which cannot be overwritten or removed). This is a large part of the reason why the mapset ownership check exists.
Similar issues can arise from copying maps using standard (non-GRASS) tools (if run by a privileged user, they may copy the ownership).
Modules typically don't need to do anything regarding LFS; the support is in the libraries. The main issue which affects modules is that they shouldn't assume that cell counts will fit into an "int" or even a "long". But even failing to do so won't have any effect upon I/O.