Inherited Verbosity level for grass array .write()

[jradinger]

Hi,

as already discussed in the GRASS dev mailing list ​here I recommend respectively would like to see e.g. the python function write() which is located ​here which writes an numpy array back into GRASS to behave like other GRASS modules concerning the inheriting of the verbosity level.

At the moment the function sets verbose=TRUE and if the function is used in a script the verbosity level is not inherited. I suggest to remove that line (verbose=TRUE) which might be an relict since development times (see mailing list discussion) and allow the inheriting. This issue might also exist for r.in.bin (source: Hamish).

[glynn]

Replying to jradinger:

Done in r55684.

[jradinger]

Replying to glynn:

Replying to jradinger:

Done in r55684.

Thank you. But probably needs also to be back-ported to GRASS devel and releasebranch. And what about r.in.bin (don't know were it is located).

[glynn]

Replying to jradinger:

And what about r.in.bin

What about it?

If you're referring to ​this message, you're misunderstanding his comment. The issue is with grass.script.array passing verbose=True to r.in.bin, not with r.in.bin itself.

(don't know were it is located).

The source is in raster/r.in.bin; the binary is in $GISBASE/bin.

[neteler]

Replying to glynn:

Replying to jradinger:

Done in r55684.

Should this change be backported to lib/python/array.py ?

[glynn]

Replying to neteler:

Should this change be backported to lib/python/array.py ?

Do you mean backported to 6.x?

If so: probably.

[neteler]

Replying to glynn:

Replying to neteler:

Should this change be backported to lib/python/array.py ?

Do you mean backported to 6.x?

If so: probably.

I don't see any easy backport to G6, closing - please use GRASS GIS 7 for this where it is implemented in a better way.