Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
#1455 closed task (fixed)
add `--with-liblas` to configuration switches when producing on-line manual
Reported by: | martinl | Owned by: | neteler |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | critical | Milestone: | 7.0.0 |
Component: | Compiling | Version: | svn-trunk |
Keywords: | liblas, r.in.lidar, v.in.lidar | Cc: | grass-dev@… |
CPU: | Unspecified | Platform: | Linux |
Description
GRASS 7 should be compiled with libLAS support on OSGeo server to provide r.in.lidar
and v.in.lidar
manual pages.
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
Status: | new → assigned |
follow-up: 5 comment:2 by , 13 years ago
comment:3 by , 13 years ago
Keywords: | liblas added |
---|
comment:4 by , 13 years ago
Keywords: | r.in.lidar v.in.lidar added |
---|---|
Platform: | Unspecified → Linux |
Version: | unspecified → svn-trunk |
comment:5 by , 13 years ago
Replying to hamish:
what version of libLAS do these modules need? debian/lenny doesn't have it, and debian/squeeze-sid has version 1.2.1.
but 1.6.1 is the recommended version to develop against.
These modules were developed against 1.6.1. I did not test backwards compatibility with earlier versions of libLAS. At the moment, the safest would probably be to compile libLAS yourself from the current stable release. Of course testing is welcome!
Markus M
comment:6 by , 13 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
I have compiled and installed boost and libLAS 1.6 sources on the GRASS server (Debian lenny) and modified the GRASS 7 cronjob.
Now we have
http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/html70_user/r.in.lidar.html
http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/html70_user/v.in.lidar.html
documented online.
what version of libLAS do these modules need? debian/lenny doesn't have it, and debian/squeeze-sid has version 1.2.1.
but 1.6.1 is the recommended version to develop against.
Hamish
ps - unrelated but fyi, grass65 and 70 nightly wingrass builds from fsv.cvut.cz stopped on the 22nd. 64 seems ok.