Opened 4 years ago
Closed 3 years ago
#1049 closed defect (fixed)
Inconsistency with POINT(nan nan)
Reported by: | Mike Taves | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | 3.10.0 |
Component: | Default | Version: | main |
Severity: | Unassigned | Keywords: | |
Cc: |
Description
Consider two points that use the "NaN" convention to try and create POINT EMPTY
. This example uses shapely:
from shapely import wkt from shapely.geometry import Point # two different ways to create a point with NaN point_nan_from_val = Point(float('nan'), float('nan')) point_nan_from_wkt = wkt.loads('point(nan nan)') point_nan_from_val.is_empty # False point_nan_from_wkt.is_empty # True point_nan_from_val.wkt # POINT (nan nan) point_nan_from_wkt.wkt # POINT EMPTY
And a similar example with PyGEOS (master), which side-steps #1048 by correctly writing WKB for POINT EMPTY:
import pygeos point_nan_from_val = pygeos.points(float('nan'), float('nan')) point_nan_from_wkt = pygeos.Geometry('point(nan nan)') pygeos.is_empty(point_nan_from_val) # False pygeos.is_empty(point_nan_from_wkt) # True # Different WKT pygeos.to_wkt(point_nan_from_val) # POINT (nan nan) pygeos.to_wkt(point_nan_from_wkt) # POINT EMPTY # Same WKB pygeos.to_wkb(point_nan_from_val) == pygeos.to_wkb(point_nan_from_wkt) # True
The two points behave very differently, with different WKT and same WKB (when #1048 is resolved).
Seeing that POINT EMPTY
is generally serialised in WKB as POINT(nan nan)
(#1005), it could be expected that geometries created with nan coordinate values should be POINT EMPTY
too, and not non-empty points with nan coordinates.
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 3 years ago
Milestone: | → 3.10.0 |
---|
comment:2 by , 3 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
In 693c1aa/git: