| 1 | |
| 2 | ---- |
| 3 | '''WORK IN PROGRESS''' |
| 4 | |
| 5 | ---- |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | = Proposal number : MVC framework = |
| 9 | |
| 10 | || '''Date''' || 2008/06/19 || |
| 11 | || '''Contact(s)''' || heikki || |
| 12 | || '''Last edited''' || [[Timestamp]] || |
| 13 | || '''Status''' || draft || |
| 14 | || '''Assigned to release''' || to be determined || |
| 15 | || '''Resources''' || ??? Indicate if the required resources are available to complete the proposal || |
| 16 | |
| 17 | == Overview == |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Short description of the improvement proposal. |
| 20 | ... |
| 21 | |
| 22 | === Proposal Type === |
| 23 | * '''Type''': GUI Change, Core Change, Module Change, Guideline and project governance procedures, ... |
| 24 | * '''App''': !GeoNetwork |
| 25 | * '''Module''': eg. Harvester, Kernel, Data Manager, Metadata Import, Lucene Index, Search Interface ... |
| 26 | |
| 27 | === Links === |
| 28 | * '''Documents''': [http://static.raibledesigns.com/repository/presentations/ComparingJVMWebFrameworks-ApacheConUS2007.pdf Java Frameworks Comparison 2005], [http://ozgwei.blogspot.com/2008/06/which-is-hottest-java-web-framework.html Frameworks in Google searches 2008], [http://java.dzone.com/news/what-serverside-java-web-framework-will-be-next-2008?page=0%2C0 Frameworks Comparison Discussion 2008] |
| 29 | |
| 30 | * '''Email discussions''': [http://forum.springframework.org/archive/index.php/t-16553.html Spring Mailing List], [http://saloon.javaranch.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=58&t=013326 JavaRanch] |
| 31 | |
| 32 | * '''Other wiki discussions''': |
| 33 | |
| 34 | === Voting History === |
| 35 | * Vote proposed by X on Y, result was +/-n (m non-voting members). |
| 36 | |
| 37 | ---- |
| 38 | |
| 39 | == Motivations == |
| 40 | The current configuration is .... A change to .... |
| 41 | |
| 42 | GeoNetwork uses Jeeves as an MVC framework. This is considered undesirable, because Jeeves is a very unknown framework anmongst Java/J2EE developers, and it is poorly documented. This page discusses some options to replace Jeeves by some other framework. |
| 43 | |
| 44 | |
| 45 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 49 | == Proposal == |
| 50 | An in depth proposal can be found here : link |
| 51 | ... |
| 52 | |
| 53 | === Backwards Compatibility Issues === |
| 54 | |
| 55 | == Risks == |
| 56 | |
| 57 | == Participants == |
| 58 | * List of participants and role (if necessary) in current GIP |
| 59 | |