Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of MVC_Framework


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 19, 2008, 7:26:16 AM (16 years ago)
Author:
Heikki
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • MVC_Framework

    v1 v1  
     1
     2----
     3'''WORK IN PROGRESS'''
     4
     5----
     6
     7
     8= Proposal number : MVC framework =
     9
     10|| '''Date''' || 2008/06/19 ||
     11|| '''Contact(s)''' || heikki ||
     12|| '''Last edited''' || [[Timestamp]] ||
     13|| '''Status''' || draft ||
     14|| '''Assigned to release''' || to be determined ||
     15|| '''Resources''' || ??? Indicate if the required resources are available to complete the proposal ||
     16
     17== Overview ==
     18
     19Short description of the improvement proposal.
     20...
     21
     22=== Proposal Type ===
     23 * '''Type''': GUI Change, Core Change, Module Change, Guideline and project governance procedures, ...
     24 * '''App''': !GeoNetwork
     25 * '''Module''': eg. Harvester, Kernel, Data Manager, Metadata Import, Lucene Index, Search Interface ...
     26
     27=== Links ===
     28 * '''Documents''': [http://static.raibledesigns.com/repository/presentations/ComparingJVMWebFrameworks-ApacheConUS2007.pdf Java Frameworks Comparison 2005], [http://ozgwei.blogspot.com/2008/06/which-is-hottest-java-web-framework.html Frameworks in Google searches 2008], [http://java.dzone.com/news/what-serverside-java-web-framework-will-be-next-2008?page=0%2C0 Frameworks Comparison Discussion 2008]
     29
     30 * '''Email discussions''': [http://forum.springframework.org/archive/index.php/t-16553.html Spring Mailing List], [http://saloon.javaranch.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=58&t=013326 JavaRanch]
     31
     32 * '''Other wiki discussions''':
     33
     34=== Voting History ===
     35 * Vote proposed by X on Y, result was +/-n (m non-voting members).
     36
     37----
     38
     39== Motivations ==
     40The current configuration is .... A change to ....
     41
     42GeoNetwork uses Jeeves as an MVC framework. This is considered undesirable, because Jeeves is a very unknown framework anmongst Java/J2EE developers, and it is poorly documented. This page discusses some options to replace Jeeves by some other framework.
     43
     44
     45 
     46
     47 
     48
     49== Proposal ==
     50An in depth proposal can be found here : link
     51...
     52
     53=== Backwards Compatibility Issues ===
     54
     55== Risks ==
     56
     57== Participants ==
     58 * List of participants and role (if necessary) in current GIP
     59