#5660 closed defect (fixed)
OpenFileGDB Driver fail with +2gigs GDB in version 9.3
Reported by: | pelord | Owned by: | warmerdam |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 1.11.1 |
Component: | default | Version: | unspecified |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | GDB |
Cc: |
Description
When using a 9.3 geodatabase, bigger than 2 gigs, the OpenFileGDB driver fail.
ERROR 1: Error occured in filegdbtable.cpp at line 656 Progress turned off as fast feature count is not available.
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
I've pushed the following fix that might help, but difficult to know what exactly happened in your case without access to the data. Would be good if you could confirm that it fixes the issue.
trunk r27726, branches/1.11 r27727 "OpenFileGDB: increase accepted size for field description zone up to 10 MB (#5660)"
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Replying to rouault:
There is 30 attributes : 27 strings and 3 real (double).
With the same schema, only due to varying size of the same GDB:
I successfully accessed a 2.12 go single feature class geodatabase (version 9.3) I successfully accessed a 3.21 go single feature class geodatabase (version 9.3)
It's fail with a 4.33 go single feature class geodatabase (version 9.3)
I will check if it fixes the issue.
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
ah ok, so was more a 4 GB issue than a 2 GB one. In which case, the real fix was in other tickets that went in 1.11.1. Anyway the above changes won't hurt...
comment:5 by , 8 years ago
This issue is back.
I'm now working on GDAL 2.1.0, released 2016/04/25.
When I open a GDB,version 9.3 with OpenFileGdb driver.
Here my error. 3: PEE_ORI_PROVERROR 1: Error occurred in e:\sdk\vc12\gdal-2.1\gdal\ogr\ogrsf_fr mts\openfilegdb\filegdbtable.cpp at line 717
This table is 6.2 gigs.
comment:6 by , 8 years ago
@pelord
Could you make this GDB available ?
nFieldDescLength < 10 );", so it would mean that the field descriptor section is particularly huge |
More than its size, wouldn't the GDB contain a lot of attributes (in the hundreds or more) ?