Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#5470 closed enhancement (invalid)
OSM: combine osm_id and osm_way_id for polygons
Reported by: | kyngchaos | Owned by: | warmerdam |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | OGR_SF | Version: | 1.11.0 |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | osm |
Cc: |
Description
For the OSM format driver, the current method of creating osm_id for defined osm polygons and osm_way_id for polygons created from closed ways makes a lot of trouble in a database. I can't create a primary key based on the osm_id and osm_way_id because postgres doesn't allow null fields in a primary key. So when merging, say, country extracts, where there might be a little duplication along the borders, it's difficult to remove those duplicates.
I think a better option would be to put the osm IDs for closed ways into osm_id along with normal polygon IDs (this works because they are mutually exclusive and unique) and have the osm_way_id field (or a different field name) be a flag to say that the record was created from a closed way. This makes using the osm_id as a primary key easy, and lets duplicates be easily skipped with the skipfailures option in ogr2ogr.
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
I guess I don't know anything. I did finally figure out how to create mutually exclusive unique id indexes in Postgres so I don't get duplicates from adjacent country extracts, and so far I have not had duplicate polygon and way ids when I manually merge the ids. lucky. I'll have to figure something out when I do find a duplicate.
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Way ids and relation ids can be equal
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1000 (already deleted) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Based on Jukka's findings, I think this should be closed.
Are you sure that way ids and relation ids cannot be equal ? Do you have a reference for that ?