Opened 13 years ago
Last modified 10 years ago
#3853 closed defect
Data types change converting from MID/MIF to SHP — at Version 1
Reported by: | zoltan | Owned by: | chaitanya |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 1.11.1 |
Component: | OGR_SF | Version: | unspecified |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | MITAB |
Cc: | warmerdam, Daniel Morissette, aboudreault, lpercich |
Description (last modified by )
When converting a SHP to a MID-MIF format, the data precision is lost. EG: Integer (10) becomes Integer [not Integer (10) to show longint] in the MIF file. On return from MID-MIF to Shape, I force the MIF file to contain Integer (10) in the schema, and it arrives in SHP as a Real value. Note that it is a technical requirement from our client that the Integer Length is reflected as 10 (and not zero), if it is "10" in the MIF file.
This is holding up a delivery dataset to a client, but I do understand if this cannot be solved soon.
3 Attachments (viewed via qgis 1.5.0)
original_SHP_schema.jpg is original client data.
After exporting from QGIS as midmif, the resulting MIF file contains:
Columns 25 FEAT_TYPE_ Integer OPERATIONA Integer . . GID Integer
etc....[note no "5" or "10" after the "Integer"]
re_read_midmif.jpg Is as the midmif files are opened by QGIS 1.5.0
shp_from_midmif.jpg After saving above midmif as SHP, exiting, then re-opening QGIS to read the resulting SHP file. Note that they are all "Integer 10" instead of some being "Integer 5", as our client is insisting.
Thanks & regards, Zoltan
Change History (4)
by , 13 years ago
Attachment: | shp_from_midmif.jpg added |
---|
by , 13 years ago
Attachment: | re_read_midmif.jpg added |
---|
by , 13 years ago
Attachment: | original_SHP_schema.jpg added |
---|
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Description: | modified (diff) |
Keywords: | MITAB added |
Milestone: | → 1.8.0 |
Owner: | changed from | to
Severity: | blocker → normal |
Chaitanya,
Please work on this promptly. Disregard the shapefile aspects - I believe they are already adequately addressed. The key is to ensure that OGR recognises the field width for integer fields, and treats Decimal(n,0) as integer, not real.
I think the provided dataset demonstrates Integer(n) fields. I will email you with a dataset containing Decimal(n,0) fields for you to test with.
I imagine changes will need to go upstream to MITAB though I presume the issue is primarily with the OGRLayer wrapper for MITAB. Work with Alan and/or Daniel on mitab updates.
Please manufacture a small test for the test suite to verify corrections one you have them.