Opened 18 years ago

Last modified 18 years ago

#1138 closed enhancement (invalid)

gml 3.1 : how much would it cost?

Reported by: steko@… Owned by: warmerdam
Priority: high Milestone:
Component: OGR_SF Version: unspecified
Severity: minor Keywords:
Cc: steko@…

Description

Frank,
short question: how much (money-time) would it take to get OGR fully compliant
with GML 3.1 ?

There's a chance to do that if we manage to find money?

Thanks,
Stefano

Change History (1)

comment:1 by warmerdam, 18 years ago

Stefano, 

I can't really answer that question without quite a lot of work. 

I will say that the existing driver isn't really GML 2.x compliant.
It is easy to prepare a GML 2.x compliant dataset that it can't
read because it ignores the the schema files.  

To reengineer the GML driver to use schemas, and support any proper
GML 3 dataset would be a big job.  Tens of thousands of dollars at
least.  

A more managable step would be to add support for GML 3.x geometries,
and otherwise tweak things to support at least GML 3.x "simple features
profile" (or what ever it ended up being called) datasets properly.
And genreally support 3.x as well as 2.x was supported.  I haven't done
a detailed review of the GML 3 changes, but I think this would run
somewhere between $2K USD to perhaps $6K USD. 

I'm closing this bug report for now.  Feel free to contact me directly
by email for GML 3.x costing or a proposal. 

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.