Ticket #337 (closed task: wontfix)

Opened 3 years ago

Last modified 3 years ago

[wktraster] Write online documentation for WKT Raster

Reported by: pracine Owned by: pracine
Priority: high Milestone: WKTRaster 0.1.6
Component: raster Version: trunk
Keywords: Cc: mloskot

Description


Change History

Changed 3 years ago by mloskot

  • cc mloskot added
  • summary changed from [wkt raster] Write online documentation to Write online documentation for WKT Raster

Changed 3 years ago by mloskot

Is it going to be based on DocBook? as PostGIS manual or as Wiki?

Changed 3 years ago by mloskot

  • summary changed from Write online documentation for WKT Raster to [wktraster] Write online documentation for WKT Raster

Changed 3 years ago by pracine

  • status changed from new to assigned

Changed 3 years ago by pracine

  • priority changed from medium to high

Changed 3 years ago by robe

Was thinking. Would you guys mind if I started creating an xml file of the functions with examples similar to the PostGIS reference section. By guys I mean WKT Raster folk as well as PostGIS PSC/Developers.

I was thinking of packaging this in with the trunk so it gets put as part of the PostGIS 2.0.0 documentation, but keeping it as a separate file.

Something like wktraster_reference.xml and all the reference ids would be prefixed with RT e.t. RT_ST_AsBinary. Then later on we can merge it in with the rest of reference by like name. Having it follow right after the regular PostGIS reference section for now. I think we have stuff here that is already pretty useful. Just needs some polishing and more exposure. It will be easier to stress test the functions if they are in doc book format and also attract more attention if its part of the main manual. Then have an accompanying raster_comments.sql (separate for now since its not part of core).

Thoughts? If all are agreeable, I can start putting that together.

Changed 3 years ago by pracine

Is really WKT Raster be part of PostGIS 2.0? If yes then it's probably a very good initiative. Otherwise maybe it's a better idea to keep everything together in the wiki.

Changed 3 years ago by robe

I'm optimistic it will be. The reason I was thinking of keeping it as a separate xml file is that if we don't make the 2.0 wktraster cut, then we can flip it easily into its own standalone manual.

I figure we have 10 months to a year to go before we release 2.0 since some of the stuff we had planned for 2.0 made it to 1.5. I personally see no reason to rush the release of 2.0.

Changed 3 years ago by pracine

  • status changed from assigned to closed
  • resolution set to wontfix
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.