Opened 12 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#2336 closed defect (fixed)
FIPS 20 causes wildcard expansion to wget all files
Reported by: | skipl | Owned by: | robe |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | PostGIS 2.1.9 |
Component: | tiger geocoder | Version: | master |
Keywords: | Cc: | jhughesjr |
Description
Postgis 2.1.0 beta 2, tiger_geocoder extension, tiger2012 dataset:
s.state_fips. When processing Kansas (FIPS 20), the expansion matches '20' in the year 2012. |
s.state_fips does not appear to cause any problems with the rest of the census tiger2012 directory structure. |
PostgreSQL 9.2.4 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3, 64-bit POSTGIS="2.1.0beta2 r11441" GEOS="3.3.8-CAPI-1.7.8" PROJ="Rel. 4.8.0, 6 March 2012" GDAL="GDAL 1.10.0, released 2013/04/24" LIBXML="2.7.8" RASTER
Change History (11)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
Version: | 2.0.x → trunk |
---|
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
Priority: | medium → blocker |
---|
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Priority: | blocker → high |
Resolution: | fixed |
Status: | closed → reopened |
This issue appears to have only been partially fixed in version: POSTGIS 2.1.3. When loading KS - the following wget commands are still loading all files and not using the tighter '/tl_*_' pattern:
wget ftp://ftp2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2010/ZCTA5/2010/*_20* —no-parent —relative —recursive —level=2 —accept=zip —mirror —reject=html wget ftp://ftp2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2013/FACES/*_20* —no-parent —relative —recursive —level=2 —accept=zip —mirror —reject=html wget ftp://ftp2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2013/FEATNAMES/*_20* —no-parent —relative —recursive —level=2 —accept=zip —mirror —reject=html wget ftp://ftp2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2013/EDGES/*_20* —no-parent —relative —recursive —level=2 —accept=zip —mirror —reject=html wget ftp://ftp2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2013/ADDR/*_20* —no-parent —relative —recursive —level=2 —accept=zip —mirror —reject=html
comment:5 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | PostGIS 2.1.0 → PostGIS 2.1.5 |
---|
Thanks for reporting. Will try to fix in next couple of days. I was debating of just upgrading upcoming 2.1.5 to tiger 2014 which I have already in PostGIS 2.2 since 2.2 is still a ways away. I imagine the same issue exists there too.
comment:6 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | PostGIS 2.1.5 → PostGIS 2.1.6 |
---|
comment:7 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | PostGIS 2.1.6 → PostGIS 2.1.7 |
---|
comment:8 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | PostGIS 2.1.7 → PostGIS 2.1.8 |
---|
comment:9 by , 9 years ago
Milestone: | PostGIS 2.1.8 → PostGIS 2.2.0 |
---|
I have to check if this is still an issue
comment:10 by , 9 years ago
Milestone: | PostGIS 2.2.0 → PostGIS 2.1.9 |
---|
comment:11 by , 9 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
skipl thanks for the info. I plan to get this fixed before the next beta comes out.