Opened 10 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#1478 closed task (fixed)
Relocate CodeHaus Jira
Reported by: | jive | Owned by: | astrodog |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | critical | Milestone: | |
Component: | SysAdmin | Keywords: | geotools, geoserver |
Cc: |
Description
Okay, adding an issue here to open a conversation with SAC.
CodeHaus (http://www.codehaus.org) is shutting down in one months time on April 2nd:
- CodeHaus runs the JIRA issue tracker for GeoServer and GeoTools projects)
- CodeHaus runs the Confluence wiki for GeoTools
We need to make plans to migrate :(
A license to use Jira for open source projects is available, this should allow OSGeo to host an instance if SAC has capacity (in hardware and volunteers) to assist.
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
Started discussion on SAC mailing list ...
- Good news about hardware, we would need to see about how much capacity Jira would require.
- GeoServer/GeoTools PSC may be in position to act as admin as we would prefer a vendor neutral home for the issue tracker.
- We are also looking at Jira cloud hosting, but OSGeo is our preference. The community has a strong push back to use of github / track / bugzilla due to concerns about file size (for patches and test-data).
Not sure where on that wiki to put down needs. We are pretty stressed about this sudden deadline, and the earlier we transition the better as I assume codehaus will be hammered by projects migrating close to the deadline.
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Make a bullet under http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Transition_Plan_2014#Current_Needs Sub bullets with the relevant specs, disk size, etc...
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Reached out to GeoAPI project who would also appreciate finding a home at an OSGeo Jira.
comment:5 by , 10 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
Migration is starting up, will need to migrate attachments via REST.
With that in mind here are the initial projects:
comment:6 by , 10 years ago
New instance is up and is being used to report issues.
Migration of comments seems to have occurred last Friday. Issue details remain empty.
We have a release scheduled for the 18th affected by this process.
comment:8 by , 7 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
This isn't a simple yes/no question. I think we're going to need to have a longer discussion on the SAC mailing list about options.
More details and place to write down needs: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Transition_Plan_2014
Thanks - Alex