Changes between Version 38 and Version 39 of GSoC/2014/TestingFrameworkForGRASS


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 20, 2014, 9:16:19 PM (10 years ago)
Author:
wenzeslaus
Comment:

Weekly report 5

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • GSoC/2014/TestingFrameworkForGRASS

    v38 v39  
    565565
    566566[http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2014-June/069504.html report email]
     567
     568=== Week 05 ===
     569
     5701. What did you get done this week?
     571
     572I worked on the ticket #2326 since I realized that it is hard to test some things when the underlying functions or modules are not failing properly. With my mentor I discussed different ways of comparing map outputs. I was at a conference, so I was not able to actually implement any method. However, it seems that the already implemented textual comparisons and statistical values comparison (e.g., r.univar, r.info) might be more useful then the standard (MD5) check sums and value by value comparisons. I also started to write a [source:sandbox/wenzeslaus/gunittest/testing.rst?rev=60907 documentation for testing] because people started to ask about how to test.
     573
     5742. What do you plan on doing next week?
     575
     576The plan for week six was testing of what was written so far but I'm testing as I go and it seems that it is actually too soon for evaluation of the current implementation which was also planed. Instead, I plan to implement raster and vector comparisons on different basis.
     577
     5783. Are you blocked on anything?
     579
     580This is not real blocker, but I would need a large number of different tests which requires different map comparison methods to see which is the best one but since I cannot get the test without having the functions first I need to implement all of the methods, make them customizable and hope that other developers will decide later what is advantageous for their case.
     581
     582[http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2014-June/069609.html report email]