Opened 11 years ago
Last modified 9 years ago
#2029 new defect
raster legend on discrete maps not graduated
Reported by: | timmie | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 6.4.6 |
Component: | Raster | Version: | unspecified |
Keywords: | d.legend, r.reclass | Cc: | |
CPU: | Unspecified | Platform: | Unspecified |
Description
I reclassified a continous integer value raster into discrete classes.
But when adding a raster legend to the map, it still shows a continued, map with a colour gradient.
This is not true as the raster map values have true and hard class breaks.
How can I get aroudn this limitation of the map legend (this also applies to the ps.map dialogue).
Change History (5)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 11 years ago
Keywords: | d.legend added |
---|
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Replying to hamish:
How many categories in the final image?
5-15 categories.
If there are more categories than there are vertical pixels to display them in, d.legend automatically changes into smooth gradient mode; it issues you a warning telling you that it did it in that case.
I did not see this. Just a gradient legend with the category breaks as legend labels.
the various thin=, lines=, and use= options can be used to reduce the number of categories to something that will fit on the screen. Also you should check that the map being used is a CELL map, not a FCELL or DCELL.
It's DCELL.
beyond that, I'd need more information to go on about your raster. (r.info, screenshots, exact CLI commands to reproduce, xmon or wxGUI, ...)
r.info map=landcover_zones@land
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Layer: landcover_zon Date: Fri Apr 05 11:45:37 2013 | | Mapset: land Login of Creator: timmie | | Location: 6.4_merc | | DataBase: /home/timmie/gis/grassdata | | Title: Reclass of landcover | | Timestamp: none |
|
| | | Type of Map: reclass Number of Categories: 0 | | Data Type: CELL | | Rows: 12076 | | Columns: 16879 | | Total Cells: 203830804 | | Projection: Mercator | | N: 6698600 S: 6491000 Res: 100 | | E: 2205800 W: 0517900 Res: 100 | | Range of data: min = 2099 max = 3000 | | | | Data Source: | | Reclassified map based on: | | Map [landcover_base@land] in mapse | | | | Data Description: | | | | | | Comments: | | | | generated by r.reclass | | r.reclass ... | | | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
DCELL will always create a gradient legend, since it's a real number. (unless you use the use= option)
A reclass of a floating point map should be a virtual CELL map, which is what your r.info shows for the Data type.
note reclasses of floating point maps are not as well supported as reclasses of cell maps. in fact the man page says it won't work at all, but it "sort of" does. So I'm not very surprised things don't work 100% with that.
fwiw, this works fine for me in devbr6:
# North Carolina dataset g.region rast=slope r.univar -e slope perc=0,10,20,30,40,50,60,70,80,90,100 0th percentile: 0 10th percentile: 0.94092 20th percentile: 1.57311 30th percentile: 2.12774 40th percentile: 2.66269 50th percentile: 3.21512 60th percentile: 3.82967 70th percentile: 4.56931 80th percentile: 5.58133 90th percentile: 7.39227 100th percentile: 38.6894 r.reclass in=slope out=slope.deciles rules=- << EOF 0 thru 0.94092 = 1 First decile 0.94092 thru 1.57311 = 2 Second decile 1.57311 thru 2.12774 = 3 Third decile 2.12774 thru 2.66269 = 4 Fourth decile 2.66269 thru 3.21512 = 5 Fifth decile 3.21512 thru 3.82967 = 6 Sixth decile 3.82967 thru 4.56931 = 7 Seventh decile 4.56931 thru 5.58133 = 8 Eighth decile 5.58133 thru 7.39227 = 9 Ninth decile 7.39227 thru 38.6894 = 10 Tenth decile EOF d.legend slope.deciles
Hamish
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
Keywords: | r.reclass added |
---|
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
Milestone: | 6.4.4 → 6.4.6 |
---|
How many categories in the final image?
If there are more categories than there are vertical pixels to display them in, d.legend automatically changes into smooth gradient mode; it issues you a warning telling you that it did it in that case.
the various thin=, lines=, and use= options can be used to reduce the number of categories to something that will fit on the screen. Also you should check that the map being used is a CELL map, not a FCELL or DCELL.
beyond that, I'd need more information to go on about your raster. (r.info, screenshots, exact CLI commands to reproduce, xmon or wxGUI, ...)
regards, Hamish