wiki:ProjectSteeringCommitteeGuidelines

Fusion Project Steering Committee (PSC) Guidelines

Summary

This document describes how the Fusion PSC determines its membership, and makes decisions on Fusion project issues.

In brief, the committee votes on proposals on the Fusion developer's mailing list. Proposals are available for review for at least two days, and a single veto is sufficient to delay progress though ultimately a majority of members can pass a proposal.

At the discretion of the Project Steering Committee, changes may require a formal RFC? be prepared. This will typically be required for anything modifying the PSC itself and for technical changes to the code that modify the public APIs, change substantial amounts of code, or are otherwise considered technically risky or contentious.

Detailed Process

  1. Proposals are written up and submitted on the Fusion developer's mailing list for discussion and voting, by any interested party, not just committee members.
  2. Proposals need to be available for review for at least two business days before a final decision can be made.
  3. Respondents may vote "+1" to indicate support for the proposal and a willingness to support implementation.
  4. Respondents may vote "-1" to veto a proposal, but must provide clear reasoning and alternate approaches to resolving the problem within the two days.
  5. A vote of -0 indicates mild disagreement, but has no effect. A 0 indicates no opinion. A +0 indicate mild support, but has no effect.
  6. Anyone may comment on proposals on the list, but only members of the PSC's votes will be counted.
  7. A proposal will be accepted if it receives +2 (including the proposer) and no vetos (-1) except in the case where the issue requires a unanimous approval (see below).
  8. If a proposal is vetoed, and it cannot be revised to satisfy all parties, then it can be resubmitted for an override vote in which a majority of all eligible voters indicating +1 is sufficient to pass it. Note that this is a majority of all committee members, not just those who actively vote.
  9. Upon completion of discussion and voting the proposer should announce whether they are proceeding (proposal accepted) or are withdrawing their proposal (vetoed).
  10. The Committee Chair is responsible for facilitating discussion of proposals, and is responsible for keeping track of who is a member of the PSC.
  11. Addition and removal of members from the committee, as well as selection of a Chair should be handled as a proposal to the committee.
  12. The Chair adjudicates in cases of disputes about voting.

When is a Vote Required?

  • Before any changes that could cause backward compatibility issues or changes the published API.
  • Before adding substantial amounts of new code.
  • Issues of procedure.
  • When releases should take place.
  • Anything that might be controversial.

Issues Requiring Unanimous Approval

  • Changing the License for the project or repositories

Bootstrapping

Paul Spencer, Jason Fournier, Mike Adair, Chris Claydon and Julien Samuel Lacroix are declared to be the founding PSC members.

Jason Fournier is declared initial Chair of the Project Steering Committee.

The current membership of the PSC can be found on the Project Steering Committee page.

Last modified 10 years ago Last modified on Jun 2, 2008 6:18:05 AM