Opened 16 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#424 closed defect (fixed)
thirdparty boost build on ubuntu 64bit linux
Reported by: | warmerdam | Owned by: | gregboone |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | |
Component: | FDO API | Version: | 3.3.2 |
Severity: | 3 | Keywords: | thirdparty boost linux |
Cc: | External ID: |
Description
This problem was encountered with 3.3.2RC2.
The normal build_thirdparty.sh does not build boost properly on my Ubuntu 7.10 64bit amd system. It seems that the problem is that Thirdparty/Thirdparty.sh runs boost/tools/jam/src/build.sh to build "bjam", but it assumes it will be placed in Thirdparty/boost/tools/jam/src/bin.linuxx86. On my system it is placed in .../jam/src/bin.linux instead. Apparently the name of the directory is based in some fashion on the platform name.
Because bjam is at the wrong place this:
./tools/jam/src/bin.linuxx86/bjam toolset=gcc variant=release threading=multi link=static --layout=system stage
Fails and the build continues.
I would like to suggest instead something like:
./tools/jam/src/bin.*/bjam toolset=gcc variant=release threading=multi link=static --layout=system stage
I would add it is very annoying that the build.sh script continue even when subcomponents fail. It makes it very hard at the end of a third party build to know whether things worked or not.
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
OK, I give up, but I suspect the link=static is producing .a static libraries suitable only for use in statically linked apps, not for linking into a .so file.
comment:3 by , 7 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
When working around the bjam problem I also run into this:
It would appear some sort of change is needed in how the boost libraries are built to include -fPIC. I'll dig around a bit to see how this might be done, though "jam" and boost is not my strength.