Changes between Version 44 and Version 45 of WKTRaster


Ignore:
Timestamp:
04/16/09 11:23:10 (16 years ago)
Author:
pracine
Comment:

—

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • WKTRaster

    v44 v45  
    9191
    9292'''...is much more simple than PGRaster and Oracle !GeoRaster'''. WKT Raster supports...
    93   * only one type (instead of two in Oracle Spatial: SDO_GEORASTER & SDO_RASTER). In WKT Raster there are no differences between a raster and a tile: a tile is a raster and a raster is a tile. A coverage is a table of tiles.
    94   * no metadata (like PostGIS).
    95   * no masks (you can build a mask as a band).
     93  * only one type (instead of two in Oracle Spatial: SDO_GEORASTER & SDO_RASTER). In WKT Raster there are no differences between rasters and tiles: a tile is a raster and a raster is a tile. i.e. one row = one tile = one raster; one table = one raster coverage.
     94  * no metadata (like PostGIS)
     95  * no masks (you can create a mask as a band)
    9696  * no multiple dimensions (only two: x, y). Not to be confused with bands; WKT Raster DO supports multiband raster...
    97   * no pyramids (reduced resolution coverages can be stored as a separate layer).
     97  * no pyramids (reduced resolution coverages can be stored as a separate layer)
    9898
    9999== What do people think about WKT Raster? ==