Changes between Version 27 and Version 28 of WKTRaster


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 16, 2009, 5:49:50 AM (15 years ago)
Author:
pracine
Comment:

—

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • WKTRaster

    v27 v28  
    7070
    7171'''is much more simple than PGRaster and Oracle !GeoRaster'''. WKT Raster supports...
    72   * only one type (instead of two: SDO_GEORASTER & SDO_RASTER). In WKT Raster there is no differences between a raster and a tile: a tile is a raster and a raster is a tile. A coverage is a table of tiles
    73   * no metadata (like PostGIS)
    74   * no masks (you can build a mask as a band)
    75   * no multiple dimensions (only two: x, y)
    76   * no pyramids (reduced resolution coverages can be stored as a separate layer)
     72  * only one type (instead of two: SDO_GEORASTER & SDO_RASTER). In WKT Raster there is no differences between a raster and a tile: a tile is a raster and a raster is a tile. A coverage is a table of tiles.
     73  * no metadata (like PostGIS).
     74  * no masks (you can build a mask as a band).
     75  * no multiple dimensions (only two: x, y).
     76  * no pyramids (reduced resolution coverages can be stored as a separate layer).
    7777
    7878== What do people think about WKT Raster? ==