Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #5361, comment 5


Ignore:
Timestamp:
08/10/23 11:19:38 (16 months ago)
Author:
pramsey

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #5361, comment 5

    v1 v2  
    1010        }
    1111}}}
    12 Both `COMPOUNDTYPE` and `CURVEPOLYTYPE` are, structurally, multi-geometries, so it would be easy to cast them to `COLLECTION` hand them off... then a CURVEPOLYGON would be handled like a nested GEOMETRYCOLLECTION... the rings would each be a COMPOUND and each of those would in turn be a set of CURVESTRING and/or LINESTRING.
     12Both `COMPOUNDTYPE` and `CURVEPOLYTYPE` are, structurally, multi-geometries, so it would be easy to cast them to `COLLECTION` hand them off... then a `CURVEPOLYGON` would be handled like a nested `GEOMETRYCOLLECTION`... the rings would each be a `COMPOUND` and each of those would in turn be a set of `CURVESTRING` and/or `LINESTRING`.
    1313
    14 This seems... not entirely bad? And it does match the ST_Dump behaviour?
     14This seems... not entirely bad? And it does match the `ST_Dump` behaviour?