Context Navigation

Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #3888, comment 2

-              initial
+              v1
 }}}
+. strk you don't even like extensions, why do you feel the need to muck with them.
+You thought it was a stupid idea for me to introduce extension support in PostGIS in the first place.
+People who don't like extensions have always had the option to install the postgis scripts and raster scripts separately.
 The other nice thing about this, is going this way, it's much easier to fix in 3.0 when PostgreSQL extension machinery will be improved and it doesn't break backward compatibility now.  What you are asking for to me should really be done 3.0 if we think it's necessary.
+. The other nice thing about this, is going this way, it's much easier to fix in 3.0 when PostgreSQL extension machinery will be improved and it doesn't break backward compatibility now. What you are asking for to me should really be done 3.0 if we think it's necessary.
 To solve the immediate need of having extension without-raster, as I have said time and time again, the easiest way (that doesn't break backward-compatibility) is to encode it in the extension version.