Opened 12 years ago
Last modified 5 years ago
#2111 assigned enhancement
[raster] External band numbers are capped to 1 - 256
Reported by: | dustymugs | Owned by: | dustymugs |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | medium | Milestone: | PostGIS Fund Me |
Component: | raster | Version: | master |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
In looking at the code, the variable for the external band number is set to uint8_t. This is reflected by the serialized raster allocating 1 byte for the band number.
Having external band numbers set to 1 - 256 is a serious limitation considering external band data is processed through GDAL, which probably has a much higher limit.
The external band number variable should be at least uint16_t, which is the same as the number of bands variable for the raster object.
I don't know when this can be fixed as this affects the serialized raster format. The raster object does have a version flag so this fix could be introduced in PostGIS 2.1.
Change History (14)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
Milestone: | PostGIS Future → PostGIS 2.2.0 |
---|
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
So does that mean in the docs for 2.0 and 2.1 we need to say raster band count is limited to 255 bands? If you want to get it in before I release 2.1 (like in a week) I can wait and just note the issue in 2.0.
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
I won't be able to get this in before 2.1 as it will require a small but significant change to the serialized format. I'll add notes regarding the issue to the docs for 2.0 and 2.1.
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
Aren't changes to the serial format allowed only at major version (3.0)?
comment:5 by , 11 years ago
Only things that require a hard dump/reload are permitted in major versions. This change is possible because there is a version flag in the serialized format.
comment:7 by , 11 years ago
Should there be RFCs for changing the raster's serialized and WKB formats? The only changes I plan on making is bumping up the format version numbers to 1 and change the variable type for out-db band indexes from uint8 to uint16.
comment:8 by , 11 years ago
This format change would be done for PostGIS 2.2, which will still support version 0 formats. PostGIS 2.0 and 2.1 will only support version 0 formats unless folks think otherwise…
comment:9 by , 11 years ago
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
follow-up: 11 comment:10 by , 11 years ago
My bad. ST_PixelAsPolygons was a pl/pgsql function in 2.0.
comment:11 by , 11 years ago
Replying to dustymugs:
My bad. ST_PixelAsPolygons was a pl/pgsql function in 2.0.
Oops. Wrong ticket.
comment:12 by , 10 years ago
Milestone: | PostGIS 2.2.0 → PostGIS Future |
---|
comment:14 by , 5 years ago
Priority: | critical → medium |
---|---|
Type: | defect → enhancement |
The fact that this is assigned to "PostGIS Fund Me" leads me to believe that this isn't critical.
I've hit this bug working with DAYMET datasets which use a band for each day of a particular year.