Changes between Version 6 and Version 7 of Signing

Timestamp:

Nov 5, 2015, 11:44:21 AM (9 years ago)

Author:

darkblueb

Comment:

--

Signing

@@ -21 +21 @@
 '''nhv''' is observing
 
-darkblue_b comments:  I believe there are at least several, related topics here.. OSGeo.org Signing binaries in an official capacity; TLS certificates for web sites to enable modern, safe browsing; OSGeo SAC internal methods to authenticate users and machines within the OSGeo server architecture; OSGeo SAC Roadmap and implementation of chosen activities; OSGeo Board decisions of priorities, funding, and formal external alliances, both explicit and implicit.
+-----
+
+''darkblue_b comments'':  I believe there are at least several, related topics here.. OSGeo.org Signing binaries in an official capacity; TLS certificates for web sites to enable modern, safe browsing; OSGeo SAC internal methods to authenticate users and machines within the OSGeo server architecture; OSGeo SAC Roadmap and implementation of chosen activities; OSGeo Board decisions of priorities, funding, and formal external alliances, both explicit and implicit.
 
 ''After consultations and some research, I believe OSGeo can use the Debian project method of signing with a GNU PGP key, and put the LocationTech method with a certificate authority as something to be looked into... Generally, I support jgarnett in using money and authoritative signatures for OSGeo projects, but it looks like it is not a requirement to proceed.''
@@ -78 +80 @@
 
 Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:54:01 -0800
-From: Brian M Hamlin <maplabs@light42.com>
-Reply-To: Brian M Hamlin <maplabs@light42.com>
+From: Brian M Hamlin <maplabs AT light42.com>
+Reply-To: Brian M Hamlin <maplabs AT light42.com>
 Subject: Re: Let's Encrypt
-To: Seth David Schoen <schoen@eff.org>
-Cc: larrys@dakotacarto.com
+To: Seth David Schoen <schoen AT eff.org>
+Cc: larrys AT dakotacarto.com
 
 Hi Seth -
 
-  I wrote to Peter very shortly after our email exchange, but I have not heard anything back. Basically, I can sum up our inquiry this way:
+  I wrote to Peter (Eckersley, Chief Computer Scientist for the Electronic Frontier Foundation ed.) very shortly after our email exchange, but I have not heard anything back. Basically, I can sum up our inquiry this way:
 
 
@@ -103 +105 @@
 
 
-On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:19:23 -0700, Seth David Schoen <schoen@eff.org> wrote:
+On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:19:23 -0700, Seth David Schoen <schoen AT eff.org> wrote:
 
     Hi Brian,
@@ -124 +126 @@
 
     -- 
-    Seth Schoen <schoen@eff.org>
+    Seth Schoen <schoen AT eff.org>
     Senior Staff Technologist https://www.eff.org/
     Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/join