Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of Signing

Timestamp:

Nov 5, 2015, 11:10:13 AM (9 years ago)

Author:

darkblueb

Comment:

--

Signing

@@ -10 +10 @@
 *  http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2015-October/013445.html
 
-'''darkblue_b''' proposed participating in the EFF/Mozilla Foundation Let's Encrypt initiative, and generally be modern in setting up server infrastructure for a FOSS dot-org. This prompted an investigation into the acquisition and use of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) x.509 certificates (a heirarchical trust authority structure), Debian-style package signing, and this wiki page.
+'''darkblue_b''' proposed participating in the EFF/Mozilla Foundation Let's Encrypt initiative, and generally be modern in setting up server infrastructure for a FOSS dot-org. This prompted an investigation into the acquisition and use of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) x.509 certificates (a hierarchical trust authority structure), Debian-style package signing, and this wiki page.
 
 '''wildintellect''' (current SAC chair) in favor of getting SSL certs for all our websites, if some of those are the Free ones from the Lets Encrypt initiative, that is fine
@@ -20 +20 @@
 
 '''nhv''' is observing
+
+darkblue_b comments:  I believe there are at least several, related topics here.. OSGeo.org Signing binaries in an official capacity; TLS certificates for web sites to enable modern, safe browsing; internal methods to authenticate users and machines within the OSGeo server architecture; SAC Roadmap and implementation of chosen activities; Board indication of priorities, funding, and formal external alliances, both explicit and implicit.
+
+The following sections attempts to address various sections. ''This document is under construction.''
+
+
 
 == Signing Binaries based on the Debian Model