Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 11, 2014, 3:15:47 AM (10 years ago)
Author:
martinl
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure

    v3 v4  
    2222== General Procedure ==
    2323
    24 Step 1:
    25    Proposal of release: When a developer feels that it is time for a new release, she or he should propose the launch of a new release process on the developers mailing list. The Project manager (or if exists Release manager) then collects reactions to decide whether there is sufficient support for this proposal.
     24Step 1 - Proposal of release:
     25   When a developer feels that it is time for a new release, she or he should propose the launch of a new release process on the developers mailing list. The Project manager (or if exists Release manager) then collects reactions to decide whether there is sufficient support for this proposal.
    2626
    27 Step 2 (day X)- Soft freeze:
     27Step 2 (day X) - Soft freeze:
    2828   If sufficient support is present, a first announcement is sent about the upcoming release. If support is lacking, a list of outstanding issues that need to be solved before a soft freeze should be sent to the developers mailing list. This announcement has as immediate effect a soft freeze meaning that commits should be limited to non-invasive backports from the development branch. Any such backport should be announced on the developers mailing list with 24 hours advance to allow possible discussion. The announcement mail also contains an approximate time table for the release, including begin of hard freeze, RC1, RC2, final release. Sufficient time should be left between the soft freeze and the hard freeze.
    2929