Opened 16 years ago
Last modified 9 years ago
#489 new defect
g.setproj: sets proj info with missing UTM zone — at Version 2
Reported by: | hamish | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | 6.4.6 |
Component: | Projections/Datums | Version: | 6.4.0 RCs |
Keywords: | g.setproj | Cc: | |
CPU: | x86-32 | Platform: | Linux |
Description (last modified by )
Hi,
with g.setproj it is possible to set the region so that the resulting PROJ_INFO file is missing the zone: field. Perhaps this is because 'g.region -p' says the zone is -55 while g.proj had 55(S)?
G640rc2> g.setproj ... Would you still like to change some of the parameters?(y/n) [n] y WARNING: Zone in default geographic region definition: -55 is different from zone in PROJ_INFO file: 55 ... Please specify projection name >utm
[ do we want a space after the '>' prompt? ]
Do you wish to specify a geodetic datum for this location?(y/n) [y] y Please specify datum name >custom
[I did want the datum to be Australia GD 1994, but that's not a choice]
Please specify ellipsoid name >grs80 Please specify datum transformation parameters >towgs84=0,0,0 Parameters to be used are: "towgs84=0,0,0" Is this correct?(y/n) [y] y South Hemisphere(y/n) [n] y The UTM zone is now set to 55 Do you want to change the UTM zone?(y/n) [n] n UTM zone information has not been updated Projection information has been recorded for this location
then
g.proj -p -PROJ_INFO------------------------------------------------- name : Universe Transverse Mercator towgs84 : 0,0,0 proj : utm ellps : grs80 a : 6378137.0000000000 es : 0.0066943800 f : 298.2572221010 south : defined -PROJ_UNITS------------------------------------------------ unit : meter units : meters meters : 1.0
and then r.in.gdal segfaults when attempting the matching proj settings comparison. (strcmp() missing key value in lib/gis/make_loc.c)
Hamish
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
[undid "55(S)" edit in description; a while back I filed an upstream trac wish to have the orig. desc. box minimized by default to avoid accidental edits, it got some attention]
the problem is not that the UTM zone's pos/neg sign comes out wrong, the problem is that the zone: term is not written at all!
Hamish
ps- in linking to source code via trac if you skip giving a rev number you still need to use @, e.g.:
source:grass/branches/develbranch_6/general/g.setproj/main.c@#L413
The code chunk in general/g.setproj/main.c (see grass/branches/develbranch_6/general/g.setproj/main.c#L413) is:
and in lib/proj/get_proj.c it is (line 154)
So it seems to be valid?