Opened 6 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

#2557 closed enhancement (fixed)

a few new monochrome color tables (should they be backported) ?

Reported by: mlennert Owned by: grass-dev@…
Priority: normal Milestone: 7.0.0
Component: LibGIS Version: svn-releasebranch70
Keywords: colortables Cc:
CPU: Unspecified Platform: Unspecified

Description

I've just committed to trunk a few very basic monochrome color tables for general usage (blues, greens, oranges, reds). They can very easily be created manually with a two line color rules definition, and so some might argue that we should not increase the length of the list of tables, but I think it is handy (and a support to new users) to have some of such color tables in the list of predefined tables.

Any objections against backporting them to relbr7 ?

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by neteler

In general fine for me since they are handy.

A curiosity: why did you choose orange and not yellow?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/28/RGB_illumination.jpg (it would be yellow, cyan, purple as additive mixing colors of RGB)

comment:2 in reply to:  1 Changed 6 years ago by mlennert

Replying to neteler:

In general fine for me since they are handy.

A curiosity: why did you choose orange and not yellow?

Because I find gradients of yellow not easy to read. Oranges are easier to read, but less harsh then reds.

Moritz

comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by wenzeslaus

Resolution: fixed
Status: newclosed

This is part of 7.0.0, so closing as fixed.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.