| 21 | | {{{ |
| 22 | | - maybe differences in the r.stream.*-modules between all-in-memory and swapped memory mode; in my tests I can't see any difference |
| 23 | | |
| 24 | | - I've done a r.geomorphon run on the DEM; it seems the DEM is very heterogenous. may be these null values are DEM artefacts? |
| 25 | | |
| 26 | | - I've done a r.neighbor size=3 and size=5 on the DEM; there seems to be a less number of null values. maybe this indicates DEM artefacts? |
| 27 | | |
| 28 | | - I've done a r.stream.distance run with r.stream.extract-outputs (streams and flowdir) instead; there are some differences regarding null values between using r.watershed or r.stream.extract-output as r.stream.distance input |
| 29 | | }}} |
| | 21 | * maybe differences in the r.stream.*-modules between all-in-memory and swapped memory mode; in my tests I can't see any difference |
| | 22 | * I've done a r.geomorphon run on the DEM; it seems the DEM is very heterogenous. may be these null values are DEM artefacts? |
| | 23 | * I've done a r.neighbor size=3 and size=5 on the DEM; there seems to be a less number of null values. maybe this indicates DEM artefacts? |
| | 24 | * I've done a r.stream.distance run with r.stream.extract-outputs (streams and flowdir) instead; there are some differences regarding null values between using r.watershed or r.stream.extract-output as r.stream.distance input |
