Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of RFC6


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 1, 2017, 11:13:49 PM (3 years ago)
Author:
robe
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • RFC6

    v4 v5  
    77||Contact:||lr@pcorp.us    ||
    88||Status: ||[https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2017-October/thread.html#8050 In Discussion] ||
     9
     10Past discussions
     11[https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/553 Trac ticket to deprecate]
     12[https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2017-January/007652.html another request to deprecate and osm2pgsql mess]
     13[https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2012-June/005861.html more examples about how apps linking directly to GEOS C++ causing problems for other applications]
     14[https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2017-January/007653.html Pointing out removing ability to use GEOS C++ reduces users freedoms]
     15
    916
    1017We should drop C++ API because we do not have the manpower to guarantee ABI compatiblity from version to version.