Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of RFC6
- Timestamp:
- Oct 1, 2017, 11:13:49 PM (7 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
RFC6
v4 v5 7 7 ||Contact:||lr@pcorp.us || 8 8 ||Status: ||[https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2017-October/thread.html#8050 In Discussion] || 9 10 Past discussions 11 [https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/553 Trac ticket to deprecate] 12 [https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2017-January/007652.html another request to deprecate and osm2pgsql mess] 13 [https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2012-June/005861.html more examples about how apps linking directly to GEOS C++ causing problems for other applications] 14 [https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2017-January/007653.html Pointing out removing ability to use GEOS C++ reduces users freedoms] 15 9 16 10 17 We should drop C++ API because we do not have the manpower to guarantee ABI compatiblity from version to version.