Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of XPATH


Ignore:
Timestamp:
04/17/09 02:46:37 (16 years ago)
Author:
heikki
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • XPATH

    v9 v10  
    4242 * use an extra field in the Lucene index to store XPATH information
    4343 * the information stored at index time could be a !LocationPath to the object being indexed, which could be matched at search time to XPATH queries
    44  * Erik thinks this approach would 'pollute' our domain driven development model, as there is no intrinsic justification for this extra index field in our domain.
     44 * Erik thinks this approach would 'pollute' our domain driven development model, as there is no intrinsic justification for this extra index
     45   field in our domain.
    4546 * Heikki thinks that that doesn't matter, because the structure of a Lucene index is inherently not domain-driven (for example there are
    4647   fields that are repeated TOKENIZED and NON-TOKENIZED to allow for both full text search and ordering of results).