Changes between Version 17 and Version 18 of ISO2ebRIMIssues

Timestamp:

Mar 22, 2009, 3:17:20 AM (15 years ago)

Author:

heikki

Comment:

--

ISO2ebRIMIssues

@@ -17 +17 @@
 General 
 
- - The object type of !DataSet is defined in the Basic Extension package ([http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=27093 OGC 07-144r2]), as being "urn:ogc:def:ebRIM-ObjectType:OGC:Dataset". In the [http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20596 CIM spec (07-038)], many references are made to !DataSet, but with object type "urn:x-ogc:specification:csw-ebrim-cim:ObjectType:Dataset". This type is not defined in [http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20596 07-038] (nor anywhere else that we are aware of). So what should we use? For now, I'm asuming the type defined in 
-[http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=27093 07-144r2] is preferred, as it is actually defined, whereas the alternative type in [http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20596 07-038] is undefined.
+ - The object type of !DataSet is defined in the Basic Extension package ([http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=27093 OGC 07-144r2]), as being "urn:ogc:def:ebRIM-ObjectType:OGC:Dataset". In the [http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20596 CIM spec (07-038)], many references are made to !DataSet, but with object type "urn:x-ogc:specification:csw-ebrim-cim:ObjectType:Dataset". This type is not defined in [http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20596 07-038] (nor anywhere else that we are aware of). So what should we use? For now, I'm asuming the type defined in [http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=27093 07-144r2] is preferred, as it is actually defined, whereas the alternative type in [http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20596 07-038] is undefined.
 
 Table F.2 describes the creation of a !ResourceMetadata object.