Changes between Version 16 and Version 17 of ISO2ebRIMIssues


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 22, 2009, 3:16:54 AM (15 years ago)
Author:
heikki
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • ISO2ebRIMIssues

    v16 v17  
    33author: Heikki Doeleman
    44
    5 This page describes uncertainties arising from the obscurity of OGC 07-038, (mainly) section F.
     5This page describes uncertainties arising from the obscurity of [http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20596 OGC 07-038], (mainly) section F.
    66[[BR]]
    77
    … …  
    1010== Introduction ==
    1111
    12 The specification in OGC 07-038 section F about how to register ISO metadata in a ebRIM registry is rather obscure. Apart from a very loose use of language relating to specific technical concepts like XML 'elements' and 'attributes' (usually anything is called an 'attribute' or a 'property' in that document, regardless), there are more things unclear. This page lists our uncertainties in how to interpret that document.
     12The specification in [http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20596 OGC 07-038] section F about how to register ISO metadata in a ebRIM registry is rather obscure. Apart from a very loose use of language relating to specific technical concepts like XML 'elements' and 'attributes' (usually anything is called an 'attribute' or a 'property' in that document, regardless), there are more things unclear. This page lists our uncertainties in how to interpret that document.
    1313----
    1414
    … …  
    1717General
    1818
    19  - The object type of !DataSet is defined in the Basic Extension package (OGC 07-144r2), as being "urn:ogc:def:ebRIM-ObjectType:OGC:Dataset". In the CIM spec (07-038), many references are made to !DataSet, but with object type "urn:x-ogc:specification:csw-ebrim-cim:ObjectType:Dataset". This type is not defined in 07-038 (nor anywhere else that we are aware of). So what should we use ?? For now, I'm asuming the type defined in 07-144r2 is preferred, as it is actually defined, whereas the alternative type in 07-038 is undefined.
     19 - The object type of !DataSet is defined in the Basic Extension package ([http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=27093 OGC 07-144r2]), as being "urn:ogc:def:ebRIM-ObjectType:OGC:Dataset". In the [http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20596 CIM spec (07-038)], many references are made to !DataSet, but with object type "urn:x-ogc:specification:csw-ebrim-cim:ObjectType:Dataset". This type is not defined in [http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20596 07-038] (nor anywhere else that we are aware of). So what should we use? For now, I'm asuming the type defined in
     20[http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=27093 07-144r2] is preferred, as it is actually defined, whereas the alternative type in [http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20596 07-038] is undefined.
    2021
    2122Table F.2 describes the creation of a !ResourceMetadata object.