Changes between Version 14 and Version 15 of ISO2ebRIMIssues
- Timestamp:
- 03/10/09 06:08:56 (16 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
ISO2ebRIMIssues
v14 v15 42 42 - Tale F.3 : descriptiveKeywords : "The classification defines both the keyword type, the keyword and its thesaurus." Keyword type can be one of "discipline", "place", "stratum", "temporal" or "theme". Little problem: the keywords in ISO descriptiveKeywords are not qualified with any type. How can our XSLT transformation decide the type of arbitrary keywords? For now I'm ignoring the keyword type classification. 43 43 44 Section F.4 (Tables F.7, F.8, F.9) 45 46 - this section states that for every occurrence of MD_Constraints, MD_LegalConstraints and/or MD_SecurityConstraints, an instanceo of Rights is created. Then it continues to state that in case of MD_LegalConstraints, an instance of Rights and of !LegalConstraints are created. Likewise for MD_SecurityConstraints, an instance of Rights and of !SecurityConstraints is created. Now, !LegalConstraints and !SecurityConstraints *extend* Rights. Wouldn't it be better if they would actually act as such, rather than be created in addition to the instance of their base class Rights ? 47 48 44 49 Table F.15 45 50