Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of ComposedMetadataRecords

Timestamp:

08/31/09 20:26:19 (16 years ago)

Author:

simonp

Comment:

--

ComposedMetadataRecords

@@ -10 +10 @@
 == Overview ==
 
-For GeoNetwork to become part of an institutional metadata and data management fabric, it must be able to compose metadata from content held in databases external to GeoNetwork. This proposal would add two new components to the kernel and harvester modules of GeoNetwork:
+For !GeoNetwork to become part of an institutional metadata and data management fabric, it must be able to compose metadata from content held in databases external to !GeoNetwork. This proposal would add two new components to the kernel and harvester modules of !GeoNetwork:
  * WFS fragment harvester - a harvester that can import metadata fragments (also known as subtemplates) from an external database with a WFS interface
  * XLink resolver and cache - metadata records can then be composed from a skeleton with links to fragments of metadata 
@@ -20 +20 @@
 
 === Links ===
- * '''Other terms''': Metadata fragments are equivalent to subtemplates, a concept which has only ever been partially implemented in GeoNetwork. This proposal intends to implement subtemplates as fragments of metadata harvested from an external database. The idea of composed or componentized metadata and the term itself, appears to be common to many discussions on the net eg. (albeit obliquely) http://eww.jot.fm/issues/issue_2007_11/column6.pdf. Another term with similar concepts is "relational" metadata. Although there has been discussion in and around these topics, this proposal appears to be the first to suggest the mechanisms for implementing these concepts in GeoNetwork using fragments harvested from a database with a WFS interface. 
+ * '''Other terms''': Metadata fragments are equivalent to subtemplates, a concept which has only ever been partially implemented in GeoNetwork. This proposal intends to implement subtemplates as fragments of metadata harvested from an external database. The idea of composed or componentized metadata and the term itself, appears to be common to many discussions on the net eg. (albeit obliquely) http://eww.jot.fm/issues/issue_2007_11/column6.pdf. Another term with similar concepts is "relational" metadata. Although there has been discussion in and around these topics, this proposal appears to be the first to suggest the mechanisms for implementing these concepts in !GeoNetwork using fragments harvested from a database with a WFS interface. 
  * '''Email discussions''':
  * '''Other wiki discussions''':